On Thursday 15 March 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
[...]
>with "/bin/tar -f - >/tmp/test/", you ask bash to open the file
> "/tmp/test/" for write, then start tar and pass this file as its
> stdout. Obviously this is wrong. I think that what you're trying to do
> is send extracted files to /tmp/test
On Thursday 15 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Here is an example
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# dd if=00010.coyote._lib.1 bs=32k count=1
>> AMANDA: FILE 20070314104344 coyote /lib lev 1 comp .gz program
>> /bin/tar To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
>> dd if= bs=
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:12:48PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> >>Greetings;
> >> >>Someone s
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Here is an example
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] data]# dd if=00010.coyote._lib.1 bs=32k count=1
> AMANDA: FILE 20070314104344 coyote /lib lev 1 comp .gz program /bin/tar
> To restore, position tape at start of file and run:
> dd if= bs=32k skip=1 | /bin/gzip -dc | /bin/tar -f - ...
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
>On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >>Greetings;
>> >>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>> >>
>> >>I now have my scripts more or
On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>Greetings;
>>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>>
>>I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
>>kernel-2.6.20.1
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> >On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> >> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
>> >> The total number of patches between 2
> On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
> >> The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
> >> building kernels to b
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this?
>> The total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
>> building kernels to bisect this
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this? The
>> total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
>> building kernels to bisect this till the middle of June at this rate.
On Tue, Mar 13,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:31:53PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Now, can someone suggest a patch I can revert that might fix this? The
> total number of patches between 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc1 will have me
> building kernels to bisect this till the middle of June at this rate.
4 billion patches c
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>Greetings;
>>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>>
>>I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
>>kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirabl
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
>Greetings;
>Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
>
>I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
>kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
>behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh thread for this.
I now have my scripts more or less under control, and I can report that
kernel-2.6.20.1 with no other patches does not exhibit the undesirable
behaviour where tar thinks its all new, even when told to do a level 2 on
a directory tree that ha
14 matches
Mail list logo