On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:36:19PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an
> > intermediate state
> > > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is us
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
> state
> > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
> its
> > own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:41:06AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
> state
> > before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
> its
> > own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we
> We have CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS that is a specific case. It's an intermediate
> state
> before we implement a true CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL. But the option is useless on
> its
> own for users. Worse, it introduces a real overhead. OTOH we want it to be
> upstream
> to make the development of full t
4 matches
Mail list logo