Hi, Boris,
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 +
> Alison Wang wrote:
>
> > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available
> on
> > > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is
Hi Alison,
On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 +
Alison Wang wrote:
> > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on
> > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added.
>
> On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on
> >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added.
> >>
> >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does
> >> ARCH_LAYERSC
On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
>> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
>>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on
>>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added.
>>
>> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
>> not cover
> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on
> > LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added.
>
> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
> not cover LS1021 ?
[Alison Wang] LS1021A is an earlier p
On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on
> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added.
Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does ARCH_LAYERSCAPE
not cover LS1021 ?
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
> ---
> Changes in
6 matches
Mail list logo