Re: [RFT PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common

2015-10-18 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 16.10.2015 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The Exynos5250 Snow Chromebooks have a Marvell WiFi SDIO chip which > can't neither be removed nor be detected. But the node isn't marked > as non-removable and instead has the broken-cd DT property. > > This causes the device to be removed

Re: [RFT PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common

2015-10-18 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 16.10.2015 01:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The Exynos5250 Snow Chromebooks have a Marvell WiFi SDIO chip which > can't neither be removed nor be detected. But the node isn't marked > as non-removable and instead has the broken-cd DT property. > > This causes the device to be removed

Re: [RFT PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common

2015-10-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 15 October 2015 at 18:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The Exynos5250 Snow Chromebooks have a Marvell WiFi SDIO chip which > can't neither be removed nor be detected. But the node isn't marked > as non-removable and instead has the broken-cd DT property. > > This causes the device to be

Re: [RFT PATCH v2 3/6] ARM: dts: Mark SDIO as non-removable in exynos5250-snow-common

2015-10-16 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On 15 October 2015 at 18:51, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The Exynos5250 Snow Chromebooks have a Marvell WiFi SDIO chip which > can't neither be removed nor be detected. But the node isn't marked > as non-removable and instead has the broken-cd DT property. > > This