Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> Okay, reverted.
Thanks.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@v
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:45:42PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2014 08:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > /--
> > | > > Right, so, with Assabet, which has CONFIG_DMA_ZONE=y and
> > | > > CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_
On Monday 06 January 2014 08:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell, Santosh
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> >> Russell, Santosh,
> >>
> >> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. P
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Russell, Santosh,
>
> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
> compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
>
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
>> Russell, Santosh,
>>
>> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
>> compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:08 PM, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar writes:
>
>> I am afraid you didn't understood what the fix is if you say above.
>> arm_dma_limit is broken without this fix for LPAE machines with
>> memory starting 4 GB physical boundary.
>
> I wonder what CONFIG_
Santosh Shilimkar writes:
> I am afraid you didn't understood what the fix is if you say above.
> arm_dma_limit is broken without this fix for LPAE machines with
> memory starting 4 GB physical boundary.
I wonder what CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and CONFIG_ZONE_DMA do they
use?
Of course, CONFIG
On Monday 06 January 2014 02:28 PM, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Russell, Santosh,
>
> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
> compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
>
> Plea
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
Please be aware that this commit fixes nothing, its only function is
causing t
Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use
>> in this function)
>>
>> Reverting the following commit fixes
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
> arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
>
> Reverting the following commit fixes it:
Already fixed long before Christmas.
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use in
this function)
Reverting the following commit fixes it:
commit 787b0d5c1ca7ff24feb6f92e4c7f4410ee7d81a8
Author: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Mon Dec 2 20:29:12 2013 +0100
13 matches
Mail list logo