On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:41, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > Badari Pulavarty <[
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So, why is these slab cache are not getting purged/shrinked even
> > > > under
Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 14:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > So, why is these sl
Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > So, why is these slab cache are not getting purged/shrinked even
> > > under memory pressure ? (I have seen lowmem as low as 6MB). What
> >
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 17:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So, why is these slab cache are not getting purged/shrinked even
> > under memory pressure ? (I have seen lowmem as low as 6MB). What
> > can I do to keep the machine healthy ?
>
> Tried incre
Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, why is these slab cache are not getting purged/shrinked even
> under memory pressure ? (I have seen lowmem as low as 6MB). What
> can I do to keep the machine healthy ?
Tried increasing /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure? (That might not be in
2.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:23:49AM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:29:23PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 13:27, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:55:58AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > We have a 8
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:29:23PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 13:27, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:55:58AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We have a 8-way P-III, 16GB RAM running 2.6.8-1. We use this as
> > > our server to kee
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 13:27, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:55:58AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have a 8-way P-III, 16GB RAM running 2.6.8-1. We use this as
> > our server to keep source code, cscopes and do the builds.
> > This machine seems to slow down
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:55:58AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a 8-way P-III, 16GB RAM running 2.6.8-1. We use this as
> our server to keep source code, cscopes and do the builds.
> This machine seems to slow down over the time. One thing we
> keep noticing is it keeps running
Hi,
We have a 8-way P-III, 16GB RAM running 2.6.8-1. We use this as
our server to keep source code, cscopes and do the builds.
This machine seems to slow down over the time. One thing we
keep noticing is it keeps running out of lowmem. Most of
the lowmem is used for ext3 inode cache + dentry cach
11 matches
Mail list logo
