On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:31:17PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >...
> > > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > > another story with more than 100 Secti
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> > warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
> >..
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:27:54AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >...
> > Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> > another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> > warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
> >..
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
> Adrian reminded us that KCFLAGS=-fno-inline told
> another story with more than 100 Section mismatch
> warnings on 64 bit x86 with an allyesconfig build.
>...
Not -fno-inline but -fno-inline-functions-called-once
(completely diff
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I have spent the last week (the time I can afford to
> Linux stuff anyway) to improve the Section mismatch
> warnings detected by modpost.
Forgot to mention that all patches are made on top of
kbuild.git but I expect then to apply to
I have spent the last week (the time I can afford to
Linux stuff anyway) to improve the Section mismatch
warnings detected by modpost.
The problem until now has been that the Section
mismatch warnings were dependent on the actual
configuration of HOTPLUG, HOTPLUG_CPU and MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
In the de
6 matches
Mail list logo