> > I've added locks in my test tree and now I've finally got -mm to build
> > will do some testing then push more stuff upstream
>
> Thanks. At the tty layer that was probably me.
> Most of the instances already appear to be nested in some other kind of
> locking, but that doesn't make no additi
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > *ping* - Any further activity on this one? I got bit by it as well on
>> > the very first attempted boot of 25-rc2-mm1, the instant it tried to leave
>> > single-user and go multi-user.
>>
>> Valdis, any chance you can try the
>> "[PATCH] (for -mm o
On 02/20/2008 05:28 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
I think you can revert the tty-bkl-pushdown.patch. Or, as Eric suggested, just
revert this
@@ -1222,7 +1221,7 @@ static const struct file_operations tty_
.read = tty_read,
.write = tty_write,
> > *ping* - Any further activity on this one? I got bit by it as well on
> > the very first attempted boot of 25-rc2-mm1, the instant it tried to leave
> > single-user and go multi-user.
>
> Valdis, any chance you can try the
> "[PATCH] (for -mm only) put_pid: make sure we don't free the l
(sorry, the previous message was not finished)
On 02/20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> (Change the subject, cc Alan)
>
> On 02/19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:11:14 MST, Eric W. Biederman said:
> > > Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > On 02/16, Oleg Nesterov
(Change the subject, cc Alan)
On 02/19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:11:14 MST, Eric W. Biederman said:
> > Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On 02/16, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >> On 02/15, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> > : BUG: unable to handle kernel paging req
6 matches
Mail list logo
