Hello David,
I accept your points. the commit c527a0cbfc3 is correct.
I still not sure if the correct fix would have unintended consequences.
I think the most of people should only config device/filter in their machine.
After this commit, machine with duplicated devs should config 2 same copies
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:34:19PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Hi David, being filters one of the most asked questions, can I ask why we
> have so many different filters, leading to such complex interactions and
> behaviors?
>
> Don't get me wrong: I am sure you (the lvm team) have very good
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 11:13:04PM +0800, heming.z...@suse.com wrote:
> Hello list & David,
>
> The stable-2.02 branch commit c527a0cbfc391645d30407d2 may intruduce a bug.
> There is a new function label_scan_pvscan_all(), which uses
> cmd->lvmetad_filter to create devices list for scan.
>
>
Hello list & David,
The stable-2.02 branch commit c527a0cbfc391645d30407d2 may intruduce a bug.
There is a new function label_scan_pvscan_all(), which uses
cmd->lvmetad_filter to create devices list for scan.
code:
```
label_scan_pvscan_all
if (!(iter = dev_iter_create(cmd->lvmetad_filter,
