At present, dma_buf_export() takes a series of parameters, which
makes it difficult to add any new parameters for exporters, if required.
Make it simpler by moving all these parameters into a struct, and pass
the struct * as parameter to dma_buf_export().
While at it, unite dma_buf_export_named()
Hi Mauro,
On 28 January 2015 at 18:53, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
> Em Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:24:03 +0530
> Sumit Semwal escreveu:
>
>> +/**
>> + * helper macro for exporters; zeros and fills in most common values
>> + */
>> +#define DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(a)\
>> + struct dma_buf_
Em Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:24:03 +0530
Sumit Semwal escreveu:
> +/**
> + * helper macro for exporters; zeros and fills in most common values
> + */
> +#define DEFINE_DMA_BUF_EXPORT_INFO(a)\
> + struct dma_buf_export_info a = { .exp_name = KBUILD_MODNAME }
> +
I suspect that this will let
Op 28-01-15 om 13:54 schreef Sumit Semwal:
> At present, dma_buf_export() takes a series of parameters, which
> makes it difficult to add any new parameters for exporters, if required.
>
> Make it simpler by moving all these parameters into a struct, and pass
> the struct * as parameter to dma_buf_
On 28/01/15 12:54, Sumit Semwal wrote:
> At present, dma_buf_export() takes a series of parameters, which
> makes it difficult to add any new parameters for exporters, if required.
>
> Make it simpler by moving all these parameters into a struct, and pass
> the struct * as parameter to dma_buf_exp
