On Thursday 12 May 2011, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> @@ -299,17 +299,14 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
> static struct gpio_led igep_gpio_leds[] = {
> [0] = {
> .name = "gpio-led:red:d0",
> - .gpio = IGEP2_GPIO_LED0_
Hello,
I see a lot of great kernel work on the omaps.
I have a dm3730 with a DSP.
I am wondering if there is any work to make using the DSPs that are part
of some chips easier to use in some standard way such as /dev or MPI or
some other abstraction.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: se
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 07:40:32AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 04:41:32 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] omap: Remove support for omap2evm
>
> The board support has never been merged for it as noticed
> by Russell King . So let's remove the
> related dead code.
Acked-by: Mark Br
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 02:27:57PM +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
> group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
> regulators are enabled and disabled.
Acked-by: Mark Brown
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 04:48:52PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Rabin,
>
> 2011/5/14 Rabin Vincent :
> > What happened to this patch? It is neither in mainline nor in
> > linux-next.
> >
>
> This patch depends on the two with titles:
>
> introduce cross trigger interface helpers
> pm
Hi Rabin,
2011/5/14 Rabin Vincent :
> What happened to this patch? It is neither in mainline nor in
> linux-next.
>
This patch depends on the two with titles:
introduce cross trigger interface helpers
pmu: allow platform specific irq enable/disable handling
and the above patches ha
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 21:08, wrote:
> From: Ming Lei
>
> This patch supports pmu irq routed from CTI, so
> make pmu/perf working on OMAP4.
>
> The idea is from Woodruff Richard in the disscussion
> about "Oprofile on Pandaboard / Omap4" on pandabo...@googlegroups.com.
>
> Acked-by: Jean Pihet
