Hi all,
Am 18.07.2014 um 11:21 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> Hello Marek and Dr. H. Nikolaus,
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Joachim Eastwood wrote:
>> On 16 July 2014 09:17, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> Am 15.07.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Joachim Eastwood:
>>>
Hi Marek,
>>
Hello Marek and Dr. H. Nikolaus,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Joachim Eastwood wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 09:17, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> Am 15.07.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Joachim Eastwood:
>>
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> You seem to add some DT nodes for hw that doesn't have drivers in
>>> ma
On 16 July 2014 09:17, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
> Am 15.07.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Joachim Eastwood:
>
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> You seem to add some DT nodes for hw that doesn't have drivers in
>> mainline. I think you should leave those out until the driver itself
>> is upstream and the bindings f
Hi Joachim,
is there some policy for only having nodes for existing drivers in DT files?
If I understand the device tree concept correctly, it should not describe
drivers
(and hence nothing about the state of them being mainlined), but it should
statically
describe the given hardware in a way th
Hi Marek,
You seem to add some DT nodes for hw that doesn't have drivers in
mainline. I think you should leave those out until the driver itself
is upstream and the bindings for it is documented.
On 14 July 2014 22:20, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko
> Signed-off-by: H. Niko
Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dts | 443 +++---
1 file changed, 412 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dts
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dts
index 21551
