Hello Paul,
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Walmsley [mailto:p...@pwsan.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:50 AM
> To: Pagare, Abhijit
> Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP CP
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul
> > Walmsley
> >
> > I guess the rollup should probably be CHIP_IS_OMAP44XX. Do you happen to
> > know whether
org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] OMAP CPU ID: fix OMAP4 build failure
>
> Hello Abhijit,
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > > So now it can be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1.
> > > I think CH
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > So now it can be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1.
> > I think CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 would be redundant in that case and should be
> > removed. A patch would be essential to take care of that in the places
> > where i
Hello Abhijit,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Pagare, Abhijit wrote:
> I think the latest patch-set that I had posted has this change in it.
> You can refer to the patch in the link below
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=126088474831309&w=2
Looks like this patch had somehow not made it into the for_
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Shilimkar, Santosh
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:52 PM
> > To: Pagare, Abhijit; Paul Walmsley; Pagare, Abhijit
> > Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > ker...@lists.infradead.org
Santosh,
> -Original Message-
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 12:52 PM
> To: Pagare, Abhijit; Paul Walmsley; Pagare, Abhijit
> Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PA
Abhijit,
> I had used this flag earlier as there was nothing fixed as to name it as ES1
> that time. So now it can
> be migrated from CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 to CHIP_IS_OMAP4430ES1. I think
> CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 would be redundant
> in that case and should be removed. A patch would be essential to take
Hello Paul,
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-omap-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Walmsley
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:44 AM
> To: abhijit.pag...@ti.com
> Cc: t...@atomide.com; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker..
