Hi Richard,
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > Virtual clocks should soon be eliminated from the OMAP clock tree. (
> > "Virtual clocks" is here used to refer a clock that does not have a
> > referent in the hardware; the usage of the term in the code is loose.)
> > So far as I kno
> Virtual clocks should soon be eliminated from the OMAP clock tree. (
> "Virtual clocks" is here used to refer a clock that does not have a
> referent in the hardware; the usage of the term in the code is loose.)
> So far as I know, all of the OMAP virtual clocks have either turned out to
> be su
Hello Russell,
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:35:15PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > Every OMAP2/3 clock must now have an assigned clockdomain, so we can
> > remove the checks from clk_enable()/clk_disable(). Instead, verify
> > that the clockd
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:35:15PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Every OMAP2/3 clock must now have an assigned clockdomain, so we can
> remove the checks from clk_enable()/clk_disable(). Instead, verify
> that the clockdomain is present only at clock init time via the
> arch_clock clk_register() h
