On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 10:47:29PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:27:31PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> >
> >>I forgot to add that to help us solve this we are ready to hire a paid
> >>consultant please contact me by mail or pho
Mark Hahn wrote:
which is right at the edge of what I need. I want to read the doc on
stripe_cache_size before going huge, if that's K 10MB is a LOT of
cache
when 256 works perfectly in RAID-0.
but they are basically unrelated. in r5/6, the stripe cache is
absolutely
critical in caching par
Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:27:31PM +0100, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
I forgot to add that to help us solve this we are ready to hire a paid
consultant please contact me by mail or phone at +33.1.46.47.21.30
Update: we eventually succeded in reassembling
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason was that my dev tree was tainted by this bug:
>
> if (good_bytes &&
> - scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
> + scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, result
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:05:39AM -0800
> > On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:00:12 +0100
> > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear,
> > > which
John McMonagle wrote:
Have a raid1 backup server that seems to get corrupted.
This is the 3rd time in about a year.
Have 2 other backup servers that were cloned from this one that have
no problems.
Done a couple kernel upgrades recently.
Now has 2.6.18-2 kernel.
It's based on Debian sarge.
I
Michael Tokarev wrote:
Andre Majorel wrote:
[]
Thanks Jurriaan and Gordon. I think I may still be f*cked,
however. The Lilo doc says you can't use raid-extra-boot=mbr-only
if boot= does not point to a raid device. Which it doesn't because
in my setup, boot=/dev/sda.
Using boot=/dev/md5 would
