linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; Raz Baussi
Subject: RE: CQ overrun with ib_send_bw
The patch is attached.
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 04:36 -0700, Amir Ancel wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> We've seen this issue as well.
>
> Can you send the patch directly to us ?
>
> Added Raz from my t
gt; Amir Ancel
> Performance Team Manager
> Mellanox Technologies
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tziporet Koren
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:19 PM
> To: Ralph Campbell; Hefty, Sean; Ido Shamay; Amir Ancel
> Cc: Sumeet Lahorani; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Subje
2:19 PM
To: Ralph Campbell; Hefty, Sean; Ido Shamay; Amir Ancel
Cc: Sumeet Lahorani; linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: CQ overrun with ib_send_bw
On 8/13/2010 10:21 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>>> I know there is a bug with &q
On 8/13/2010 10:21 PM, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
>>> I know there is a bug with "ib_send_bw -b" (bi-directional)
>>> since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
>>> posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get
On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 12:14 -0700, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> > I know there is a bug with "ib_send_bw -b" (bi-directional)
> > since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
> > posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get the
> > following patch applied but I never got
> I know there is a bug with "ib_send_bw -b" (bi-directional)
> since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
> posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get the
> following patch applied but I never got a reply and nothing was
> done.
Who's the maintainer of thes
I know there is a bug with "ib_send_bw -b" (bi-directional)
since it doesn't create a CQ that is large enough for all the
posted sends *and* receives. I have tried several times to get the
following patch applied but I never got a reply and nothing was
done.
diff --git a/send_bw.c b/send_bw.c
ind
