On Wednesday, March 29, 2017, Linus Walleij:
> If you prefer to use preprocessor macros or whatever to make the bitmasks
> or how you want to organize the constants in your include files is not my
> concern, do whatever you seem fit, just pack it into a 32bit thing somehow
> which makes sense from
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Chris Brandt wrote:
>> I'm strongly in favour of something like
>> pinmux = , ;
>>
>> opposed to
>> pinmux = , ... ;
>
>
> I agree. I like "".
I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
>> I do not understand the notion of "flags" here. I hope that is not referring
>
> Flags refers to BI_DIR, SWIO_IN, and SWIO_OUT, from
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9643047/
Aha I will go in and review that
Adding my 2 cents here:
On Wednesday, March 29, 2017, jacopo wrote:
> > > If you really do we may need to go for u64 but ... really? Is there
> > > a rational reason for that other than "we did it like this first"?
> > >
> > > I do not understand the notion of "flags" here. I hope that is not
> >
Hi Geert, Linus
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:20:39PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> >>> See for example:
Hi Linus,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Linus Walleij
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>>> See for example:
>>> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h
>>>
>>> And how that is used in:
>>>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Me:
>> See for example:
>> include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h
>>
>> And how that is used in:
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-pinfunc.h
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts
>>
>> The docs are here:
>>
Hi Linus,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
>>> The fact that historically all the early adopters of pinctrl in device
>>> tree
>>> have these funky custom bindings is unfortunate but
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:38 PM, wrote:
>> The fact that historically all the early adopters of pinctrl in device
>> tree
>> have these funky custom bindings is unfortunate but just something
>> that we need to live with.
>>
>
> To avoid any confusion, please bear with me and
Hi Linus,
On 2017-03-28 11:46, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:02 PM, jacopo wrote:
> + Required properties:
> +- renesas,pins
Just "pins"?
You know, I've been thinking about this, bu the "pins" property
definition in pinctrl-bidings is the
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:02 PM, jacopo wrote:
>> > + Required properties:
>> > +- renesas,pins
>>
>> Just "pins"?
>>
>
> You know, I've been thinking about this, bu the "pins" property
> definition in pinctrl-bidings is the following one:
>
>
Hi Geert,
thanks for review
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:33:50AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jacopo Mondi
> wrote:
> > Add device tree bindings documentation for Renesas RZ/A1 gpio and pin
>
> for the Renesas
Hi Jacopo,
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:36 PM, jacopo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:20:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jacopo Mondi
Hi Geert,
thanks for reviews
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 02:20:08PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jacopo Mondi
> > wrote:
> >> Add device
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jacopo Mondi
> wrote:
>> Add device tree bindings documentation for Renesas RZ/A1 gpio and pin
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++
Add device tree bindings documentation for Renesas RZ/A1 gpio and pin
controller.
Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi
---
.../bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rza1-pinctrl.txt | 144 +
1 file changed, 144 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
16 matches
Mail list logo