On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:31:37AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Regardless of if an virtual backend reports a SPC-3 version (0x05) in
> INQUIRY response, an initiator is still allowed to fall back to using
> legacy SCSI-2 reservations instead of SPC-3 persistent reservations. I
> can thin
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Gwendal Grignou wrote:
>> What's the benefit of this?
> + To unify ata transport sysfs topology with other scsi transport.
My concern is the thrash and breakage to switch the ordering around
given the (minor) growing pains injecting an ata_port into the device
path
On 10/07/12 12:47, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:14 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Avoid that the sdev reference count can drop to zero before
the queue is run by scsi_run_queue(). Also avoid that the sdev
reference count can drop to zero in the same function by invoking
__blk_r
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 09:16 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
> > > SPC 2 via ->get_device_rev.
> >
On Sun, 2012-10-07 at 10:51 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:11:50PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
> > > SPC 2 via ->get_device_
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:11:50PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
> > SPC 2 via ->get_device_rev.
>
> No, the proper on-the-wire bits to signal SPC-3 compliance
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47701
Brad Campbell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lists2...@fnarfbargle.com
--- Comment
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 19:48 +0530, sreekanth.re...@lsi.com wrote:
> This is new scsi lld device driver from LSI supporting the SAS 3.0
> standard.
>
> Here is list of new 12gb host controllers:
>
> LSI SAS3004
> LSI SAS3008
> LSI SAS3108
>
> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy
> Reviewed-by: N
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 20:25 +, Love, Robert W wrote:
> On 10/3/2012 12:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > James, Robert-
> > I've been doing lots of backports of FCoE code to the RHEL tree these
> > last few months, and I've noticed something fairly irritating, and I was
> > wondering if you two
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 15:23 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> James, Robert-
> I've been doing lots of backports of FCoE code to the RHEL tree these
> last few months, and I've noticed something fairly irritating, and I was
> wondering if you two could help me out with it (in fact you two are the o
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:14 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Avoid that the sdev reference count can drop to zero before
> the queue is run by scsi_run_queue(). Also avoid that the sdev
> reference count can drop to zero in the same function by invoking
> __blk_run_queue().
[...] if (scsi_
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 23:11 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 21:49 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currenly all non-pscsi bakcneds report their standards version as
> > SPC 2 via ->get_device_rev.
>
> No, the proper on-the-wire bits to signal SPC-3 compliance are alr
12 matches
Mail list logo
