>-Original Message-
>From: Yijing Wang [mailto:wangyij...@huawei.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:38 PM
>To: James E.J. Bottomley
>Cc: Hanjun Guo; jiang@huawei.com; Yijing Wang; DL-MegaRAID Linux;
>linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: [PATCH 05/16] megaraid: clean up unnecessar
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 18:23 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:17:37PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:15 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Mmmm, I'm able to reproduce over here with ahci + scsi-mq, and it
> > appears to be a bug related
> "Ben" == Ben Collins writes:
Ben,
Ben> Considering your patch has had two success stories (I suspect yours
Ben> was on SPARC, so that would even make two different platforms) and
Ben> low likelihood of regression on little endian, I think it's pretty
Ben> safe.
I ordered a MegaRAID card t
>
> >
> > James
> >
> > The patch origin is unknown. I got it from Tomas and Bud who think it may
> > have originated from HP. I cleaned it up, compile tested it, and sent it
> > on. I'll review my procedures for future patches.
> >
> > -- mikem
> >
Patch originated from me, although Tomas did t
On 13-08-15 12:45 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
Jens / James, do you guys plan to send this to Linus for 3.11?
Triggering this bug is a bit esoteric but the impact is pretty nasty
(corrupting an unrelated process).
The patch is fine with me. Even though the sg driver is
named in the patch title, I n
Jens / James, do you guys plan to send this to Linus for 3.11?
Triggering this bug is a bit esoteric but the impact is pretty nasty
(corrupting an unrelated process).
Thanks,
Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vge
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:17:37PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 21:15 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Mmmm, I'm able to reproduce over here with ahci + scsi-mq, and it
> appears to be a bug related with using sdev->sdev_md_req.queue_depth=1,
> that ends up causing t
> On 6/29/2013 11:10 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> 2013/6/29 James Bottomley :
>>> On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 22:39 +0530, Santosh Y wrote:
index 19618c6..431ddb2 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1711,6 +1711,25 @@ void ufshcd_remove(struct ufs_
Hi Sreekanth,
Will there be a follow up patch to fix the crash scenario? Is there
some error path in _base_allocate_memory_pools that isn't handled
gracefully that needs to be cleaned up?
Also, I think fixes in this space could apply to the mpt2sas driver as
well.
Regards,
-- Joe
On Wed, 14
On 08/14/2013 11:41 PM, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:27 PM
> To: Miller, Mike (OS Dev); mi...@thumper.usa.hp.com
> Cc: Andrew Morton; Jens Axboe; LKML-scsi; LK
On 08/14/2013 05:38 PM, Reddy, Sreekanth wrote:
> Hi Tomas,
>
> The crash happens when the kernel couldn't allocate the DMA'able memory that
> the driver requests for Reply Descriptor post queue. The amount of memory
> allocated is directly proportional to the HBA queue depth and the number of
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
