On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> During the Linux 4.13 development cycle, cciss driver has been removed
> in flavor to hpsa driver that has been amended with some legacy board
> support.
It's gone in 4.14 - 4.13 works the old way.
>
> * man4/cciss.4 (.SH DESCRIPTION): Mention
On 10/09/17 5:48 PM, "Christos Gkekas" wrote:
>Pointers bnx2i_cmd are set but never used, so they can be removed.
>
>Signed-off-by: Christos Gkekas
>---
> drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_hwi.c | 10 --
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_hwi.c
>b/drivers/s
During the Linux 4.13 development cycle, cciss driver has been removed
in flavor to hpsa driver that has been amended with some legacy board
support.
* man4/cciss.4 (.SH DESCRIPTION): Mention driver removal.
* man4/hpsa.4 (.SH DESCRIPTION): Mention list of boards that recognised
since Linux 4.13.
Hi,
Ping!!!
Should I drop this patch and send another one which removes UFS_BIT() macro?
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Bart,
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On 08/28/2017 09:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 17:49 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> This
On 09/07/2017 11:54 PM, Ouyangzhaowei (Charles) wrote:
> shost->async_scan should be protected by mutex_lock, otherwise the check
> of "called twice" won't work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ouyang Zhaowei
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff -
On 08/31/2017 02:19 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> When a NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification is received the network
> device is _deleted_ after the callback returns.
> So we cannot use a workqueue here, as this would cause an
> inversion when removing the device as the netdev is already gone.
> This m
On 08/31/2017 02:19 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Separate out fcoe_vport_remove() from fcoe_destroy_work().
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
> ---
> drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 55
> +---
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 22
On 08/31/2017 02:19 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> No functional change.
Nit: Then why do it? Perhaps the description can say why such a change
is being done?
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
> ---
> drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 12 +++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Pointers bnx2i_cmd are set but never used, so they can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Christos Gkekas
---
drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_hwi.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_hwi.c
index 42921db..e3f22cb 100644
--- a/
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Becca MacKenzie, We are interested in your products and want to make you
and your company our major suppliers but first we would like your to send us
your best price list and Catalog if possible.
We will be ordering in large quantity so we are looking forward in making a
10 matches
Mail list logo