With the current design we're waiting for all async probes to
finish when removing any sd device.
This might lead to a livelock where the 'remove' call is blocking
for any probe calls to finish, and the probe calls are waiting for
a response, which will never be processes as the thread handling
the
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:14 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> With the current design we're waiting for all async probes to
> finish when removing any sd device.
> This might lead to a livelock where the 'remove' call is blocking
> for any probe calls to finish, and the probe calls are waiting for
>
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:14 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> With the current design we're waiting for all async probes to
> finish when removing any sd device.
> This might lead to a livelock where the 'remove' call is blocking
> for any probe calls to finish, and the probe calls are waiting for
>
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 09:05 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> How does this preserve ordering? It looks like you have one cookie per
> sdkp ... is there some sort of ordering guarantee I'm not seeing?
Hello James,
Since the probe order depends on the order in which __async_probe() adds
entries to
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:30 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 09:05 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > How does this preserve ordering? It looks like you have one cookie
> > per sdkp ... is there some sort of ordering guarantee I'm not
> > seeing?
>
> Hello James,
>
> Since t
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 09:33 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:30 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 09:05 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > How does this preserve ordering? It looks like you have one cookie
> > > per sdkp ... is there some sort of ord
On 03/21/2017 02:33 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:30 +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 09:05 -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> How does this preserve ordering? It looks like you have one cookie
>>> per sdkp ... is there some sort of ordering guarantee
On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 16:25 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 02:05 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:14 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > With the current design we're waiting for all async probes to
> > > finish when removing any sd device.
> > > This might lea
On 03/21/2017 02:05 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:14 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> With the current design we're waiting for all async probes to
>> finish when removing any sd device.
>> This might lead to a livelock where the 'remove' call is blocking
>> for any probe ca
On 03/21/2017 04:33 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 16:25 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 03/21/2017 02:05 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2017-03-21 at 13:14 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
With the current design we're waiting for all async probes to
finish w
10 matches
Mail list logo