On Wed, Nov 11 2015 at 6:28am -0500,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:53:24AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> > We no longer have the bvec merge functions so the original reason given
> > in the thread/patch Bart referenced is no longer valid.
> >
> > Offlist it was suggested
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:53:24AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> We no longer have the bvec merge functions so the original reason given
> in the thread/patch Bart referenced is no longer valid.
>
> Offlist it was suggested that dropping the argument from submit_bio
> might still improve performan
On 11/07/2015 04:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:53:39AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
>>> If you have to touch submit_bio() and submit_bio_wait(), how about
>>> requiring the callers of these functions to set the cmd and flags
>>> arguments in the bio structure and to le
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 10:53:39AM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> > If you have to touch submit_bio() and submit_bio_wait(), how about
> > requiring the callers of these functions to set the cmd and flags
> > arguments in the bio structure and to leave out the cmd and flags
> > arguments from the su
On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 04:07:57PM -0600, mchri...@redhat.com wrote:
> Known issues:
> - REQ_FLUSH is still a flag, but should probably be a operation.
> For lower level drivers like SCSI where we only get a flush, it makes
> more sense to be a operation. However, upper layers like filesystems
> c
- Original Message -
> This is just a resend of the patchset from earlier today. There was
> a error in the middle of sending the set, so it looks like 10 - 32 got
> dropped.
>
> There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support
> for in the near term:
>
> compare a
This is just a resend of the patchset from earlier today. There was
a error in the middle of sending the set, so it looks like 10 - 32 got
dropped.
There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support
for in the near term:
compare and write
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-
On 11/04/2015 10:49 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> If you have to touch submit_bio() and submit_bio_wait(), how about
> requiring the callers of these functions to set the cmd and flags
> arguments in the bio structure and to leave out the cmd and flags
> arguments from the submit_bi
On 11/04/2015 08:32 AM, mchri...@redhat.com wrote:
There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support
for in the near term:
compare and write
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg07826.html
copy offload/extended copy/xcopy
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2
There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support
for in the near term:
compare and write
http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg07826.html
copy offload/extended copy/xcopy
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-July/msg00070.html
The problem is if we contine
10 matches
Mail list logo
