I know this is pretty tedious, but, ping?
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 20:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I'd like to package sunxi-tools for Debian and therefore it is important for
> the licensing information to be complete/accurate. I believe the intention was
> for everything here to be GPL2+, since
I have to use the SPI serial flash boot mode in A13.
Is there the SPI serial flash boot mode implemented int A13 ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
tor 2014-06-12 klockan 09:05 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell:
> I know this is pretty tedious, but, ping?
>
> On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 20:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > I'd like to package sunxi-tools for Debian and therefore it is important for
> > the licensing information to be complete/accurate. I be
ons 2014-06-11 klockan 23:42 -0700 skrev Nohee Park:
> I have to use the SPI serial flash boot mode in A13.
> Is there the SPI serial flash boot mode implemented int A13 ?
Th A13 supports SPI boot, but we do not have a known working SPI boot
loader to store on the SPI flash.
Regards
Henrik
--
2014-06-12 13:30 GMT+04:00 Henrik Nordström :
> ons 2014-06-11 klockan 23:42 -0700 skrev Nohee Park:
> > I have to use the SPI serial flash boot mode in A13.
> > Is there the SPI serial flash boot mode implemented int A13 ?
>
> Th A13 supports SPI boot, but we do not have a known working SPI boot
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 11:29 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> tor 2014-06-12 klockan 09:05 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell:
> > I know this is pretty tedious, but, ping?
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 20:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I'd like to package sunxi-tools for Debian and therefore it is impo
Hi i have build the kernel
for cubie2 and work fine.
I try to use same kernel , but with different dtb for cubie1
But the kernel not boot!
This is ths content of my uEnv.txt
autoload=no
bootargs=earlyprintk console=ttyS0,115200 root=/dev/mmcblk0p3 ro
rootfstype=ext4 loglevel=8 rootwait mac_addr=c
On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 20:26 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Where do I get brcmfmac43362-sdio.txt?
I seem to be using
http://dl.cubieboard.org/public/Cubieboard/benn/firmware/ap6210/nvram_ap6210.txt
but I don't recall how I discovered that.
Ian.
--
You received this message because you are
I added the ap6210.txt file. Now I get...
root@linaro-developer:~# dmesg | grep brcm
[ 14.656712] brcmfmac: F1 signature read @0x1800=0x1591a962
[ 15.123388] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware version =
wl0: Apr 22 2013 14:50:00 version 5.90.195.89.6 FWID 01-b30a427d
[ 15.208407]
But I do have a wlan0 device now. I'll see if it works.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:21 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I added the ap6210.txt file. Now I get...
>
> root@linaro-developer:~# dmesg | grep brcm
> [ 14.656712] brcmfmac: F1 signature read @0x1800=0x1591a962
> [ 15.123388] brcmfm
Fine with me.
Original message
From: Ian Campbell
Date:06/12/2014 6:42 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Henrik Nordström
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,Eric Molitor ,Alejandro Mery ,Patrick Wood
,Pat Wood
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH sunxi-tools] Add copyright headers to various
files
Fine with me.
Original message
From: Ian Campbell
Date:06/12/2014 4:06 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom ,Eric Molitor ,Alejandro Mery ,Patrick Wood ,Pat Wood
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH sunxi-tools] Add copyright headers to various
files
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> Any ideas why the second CPU isn't booting?
>
> root@linaro-developer:/etc# dmesg | grep -i CPU
> [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
> [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
> [0.00] Initializing cgroup s
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Any ideas why the second CPU isn't booting?
>>
>> root@linaro-developer:/etc# dmesg | grep -i CPU
>> [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
>> [0.00] Initial
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> Any ideas why the second CPU isn't booting?
>>
>> root@linaro-developer:/etc# dmesg | grep -i CPU
>> [0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
>> [0.00] Initial
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> Any ideas why the second CPU isn't booting?
>>>
>>> root@linaro-developer:/etc# dmesg | grep -i CPU
>>> [
Any ideas why the second CPU isn't booting?
root@linaro-developer:/etc# dmesg | grep -i CPU
[0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
[0.0
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
Any ideas why the second CPU isn't booting?
>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:18 PM, jonsm...@gmail.
I think I got those too but it did work.
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 09:24 -0400, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> But I do have a wlan0 device now. I'll see if it works.
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:21 AM, jonsm...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > I added the ap6210.txt file. Now I get...
> >
> > root@linaro-deve
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 11:29 +0200, Henrik Nordström wrote:
> tor 2014-06-12 klockan 09:05 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell:
> > I know this is pretty tedious, but, ping?
> >
> > On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 20:39 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > I'd like to package sunxi-tools for Debian and therefore it is impo
Hi,
On 06/12/2014 03:21 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> I added the ap6210.txt file. Now I get...
>
> root@linaro-developer:~# dmesg | grep brcm
> [ 14.656712] brcmfmac: F1 signature read @0x1800=0x1591a962
> [ 15.123388] brcmfmac: brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Firmware version =
> wl0: Apr 22 2
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/12/2014 03:21 PM, jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I added the ap6210.txt file. Now I get...
>>
>> root@linaro-developer:~# dmesg | grep brcm
>> [ 14.656712] brcmfmac: F1 signature read @0x1800=0x1591a962
>> [ 15.123388] brc
tor 2014-06-12 klockan 20:02 +0100 skrev Ian Campbell:
> You also wrote usb-boot (Alejandro Mery and Michal Suchanek contributed
> a tiny typo fix each). Do you prefer MIT for that one too?
Yes, that too should be MIT for the same reasons.
> You also authored a fair wedge of Makefile. Are you ok
What has replaced sw_get_ic_ver() on 3.15?
Codec code varies on every chip revision A,B,C and A10/20.
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
El 12/06/14 19:11, jonsm...@gmail.com escribió:
What has replaced sw_get_ic_ver() on 3.15?
Codec code varies on every chip revision A,B,C and A10/20.
A10/A20 can be determined by the compatible string. Chip revision is
going to be trickier though, there is no direct replacement of
sw_get_ic_
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Emilio López wrote:
> El 12/06/14 19:11, jonsm...@gmail.com escribió:
>
>> What has replaced sw_get_ic_ver() on 3.15?
>>
>> Codec code varies on every chip revision A,B,C and A10/20.
>
>
> A10/A20 can be determined by the compatible string. Chip revision is going
>
We have the source code for the SPDIF driver. And the clock and
register blocks are in the user manual. The chapter on how to program
the SPDIF block is missing.
Is it in a Chinese version of manual somewhere? Since I have the
driver code already I can just stick the Chinese into Google translate
I'd like to package sunxi-tools for Debian and therefore it is important for
the licensing information to be complete/accurate. I believe the intention was
for everything here to be GPL2+ by default, since that is the license on every
file which has one and COPYING contains GPL2.
Early on the lice
29 matches
Mail list logo