On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:44:40PM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 19-03-15 12:39, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>
>> When Allwinner stated that they did CedarX2.0 about two months ago,
>> they added _more_ lgpled code. Bu
Hey,
On 19-03-15 12:39, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
When Allwinner stated that they did CedarX2.0 about two months ago,
they added _more_ lgpled code. But this time they tried to trivially
disguise the code origins. This is a totally
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:05:30AM +0100, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> Luc, Sunxi-community,
>
> It looks like they replaced a few function (names only) so the symbols
> don't show up with a simple grep (I cannot find ff_huff_build_tree for
> example). Can anybody confirm/deny that they went over
Luc, Sunxi-community,
It looks like they replaced a few function (names only) so the symbols
don't show up with a simple grep (I cannot find ff_huff_build_tree for
example). Can anybody confirm/deny that they went over a list of a few
functions just to change the names/obfuscate things? The sy