On Wednesday 19 December 2001 08:05, Richard R. Sivernell enunciated:
> is that acpi not apic I do not find
>
> acpi is ups support
Yes you did say that but make real sure you do need them, mine is disabled.
--
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61
--- "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lonni
>
> kernel.org has this:
> Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
>
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.tar.gz
>
> I can get it today if you think it would help, that is no proble.
>
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:52:21 -0500
Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> > @
> > hunley.homeip.net
>
> http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/
> --
> Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
> Admin: http://linux.nf
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> @
> hunley.homeip.net
http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net
Your mom is a monolithic kernel!
__
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> > 2.4.12 is at http://huley.homeip.net/linux_sources/ along with
> I get either Denied access or no server of that name
that would be cause I cant type... http://hunley.homeip.net/linux_sources/
sorry
--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Lin
@
hunley.homeip.net
Server says... "401 Error - Unauthorized
Access"
So?
Remember the last time you saw some cheesy
Hollywood movie where they used computers in a
completely unrealistic way?
Remember how some "hacker" tried to break
into
some system and kept getting a big
ACCESS DENIE
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 06:55:55 +1000
Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 December 2001 01:23, Richard R. Sivernell enunciated:
> > List
> >
> > Building the 2.4.16 kernel here, all went well, till I did my
> > happy birthday song for Doug, this morn .
> >
> > I followed all
--- "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:47:46 -0500
> Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> > > Lonnie
> > >
> > > kernel.org has this:
> > > Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
> > >
>
ftp
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 14:47:46 -0500
Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> > Lonnie
> >
> > kernel.org has this:
> > Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.t
>
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 01:23, Richard R. Sivernell enunciated:
> List
>
> Building the 2.4.16 kernel here, all went well, till I did my
> happy birthday song for Doug, this morn .
>
> I followed all of the SxS recompile->
> Automated Kernel Compile script including System.map
> make[2]:
I'm currently running W3.1 with kernel 2.4.16 and ext3. All I had to do was
upgrade e2fsprogs to 1.25 and compile ext3 into the kernel(not a module) and
it worked. I tried to compile util-linux and it didn't work. I can't
remember the error, but I didn't do it. Currently only having a probl
Doug
Thanks will do.
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera e-Server 3.1
Registered Linux User #193859
.~.
/ v \
/( _ )\
^ ^
In Linux we trust!
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archiv
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> Lonnie
>
> kernel.org has this:
> Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.t
>ar.gz
>
> I can get it today if you think it would help, that is no proble.
> any special th
Lonnie
kernel.org has this:
Stable Version: 2.4.11 at their dl site ( ftp )
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/modutils/v2.4/modutils-2.4.11.tar.gz
I can get it today if you think it would help, that is no proble.
any special thing to be aware of in making this tarball?
cheers
--
--- "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lonnie
>
>Thanks for reply.
> view /usr/src/linux-2.4.16/Documentation/Changes read as follows:
> Rqd Have
> o Gnu C 2.95.3 * 2.95.2 # gcc
> --version
> o Gn
Rick,
I believe you need to upgrade the modutils. I use SuSE, but it did have
a new modutils.rpm when I upgraded the default suse kernel to 2.4.16.
Best,
Keith B.
"Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Lonnie
>
> Thanks for reply.
> view /usr/src/linux-2.4.16/Documentation/Change
Richard R. Sivernell babbled on about:
> o util-linux 2.10o * 2.10m # fdformat
>
> The * are less than required, do any of these cause a problem?
>
> This is a stock Caldera Server 3.1 system PIII
can't speak about the others, but the one above is just for ext3 issues
Lonnie
Thanks for reply.
view /usr/src/linux-2.4.16/Documentation/Changes read as follows:
Rqd Have
o Gnu C 2.95.3 * 2.95.2 # gcc --version
o Gnu make 3.773.79.1 # make --version
o b
Whenever "make modules_install" complains about anything, its almost
always because you've got an outdated version of modutils. So, what
version of modutils do you have installed? It needs to be at least what
is recommended in /usr/src/linux/Documentation/Changes
--- "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EM
List
Building the 2.4.16 kernel here, all went well, till I did my
happy birthday song for Doug, this morn .
I followed all of the SxS recompile->
Automated Kernel Compile script including System.map
moved dl to the below directory
/usr/src/linux-2.4.16
used the config file created from the 2
20 matches
Mail list logo
