Re: [PATCH 5/9] cfg80211/nl80211: add authorized flag to roaming event

2017-05-01 Thread Johannes Berg
On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 11:40 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > > So I will include this patch in my patchset for PSK/1X offloading > takenĀ above into account. Great, thanks! johannes

Re: [linux-nfc] [[PATCH v1] 0/6] Support of ST NFC Transceiver

2017-05-01 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Shikha, > *** V1.0 *** > This patch series is generated on top of latest > code available on nfc-next. > > This patch series introduces the following features: > > (a) A generic Digital NFC UART framework. > The framework itself is an LDISC registered > with the tty core. Any NFC transciever

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 1/6] NFC: add generic UART support

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
Some NFC controller supports UART as host interface. Such controllers which are direct implementation of digital protocol can use this framework. This patch add the generic support of UART and provides some extension API for vendor specific needs. This code is strongly inspired by the nci ldisc im

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 4/6] NFC: nfcst: Add ST NFC SPI Driver

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
Add support of ST NFC transceiver controlled over SPI. This driver enables ST NFC transceiver to communicate with host over SPI interface and as a phy driver it registers with ST NFC transceiver core framework. Signed-off-by: Shikha Singh --- drivers/nfc/nfcst/Kconfig | 15 ++ drivers/nfc/nfc

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 6/6] DRIVERS: NFC: Remove st95hf name reference

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
This patch removes all references to old st95hf driver. A new ST NFC driver is added under drivers/nfc/nfcst. The new driver design is based on modular approach to have ST NFC core framework which is independent of PHY and Two ST NFC PHY drivers to support SPI and UART interfaces. Signed-off-by:

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 0/6] Support of ST NFC Transceiver

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
*** V1.0 *** This patch series is generated on top of latest code available on nfc-next. This patch series introduces the following features: (a) A generic Digital NFC UART framework. The framework itself is an LDISC registered with the tty core. Any NFC transciever implementing the digital specs

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 5/6] DT: bindings: net: nfc: stnfc binding doc

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
This patch adds ST NFC binding doc that guides how to make SPI slave node entry of ST NFC transceiver in DT file of any platform. Signed-off-by: Shikha Singh --- .../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/stnfc.txt | 50 ++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) create mode 100644 D

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 2/6] NFC: nfcst: Add ST NFC Transceiver core framework

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
This patch implements the ST NFC Transceiver core framework. This framework implements the digital specifications. ST NFC Phy drivers supporting SPI or UART interface can register with this framework when a Transceiver is connected with host using the respective interface. Following the modular de

[[linux-nfc][PATCH v1] 3/6] NFC: nfcst: Add UART LDisc Driver

2017-05-01 Thread Shikha Singh
Add support of ST NFC transceiver controlled over UART. This driver registers with the digital LDisc UART framework as an UART LDisc driver, and as a phy driver with the ST NFC transceiver core framework. Signed-off-by: Shikha Singh --- drivers/nfc/nfcst/Kconfig | 17 + drivers/nfc/nfcst/

Ubuntu (kernel 4.4) + Intel 7265N = cannot pair bluetooth

2017-05-01 Thread Luis Pablo Gallo
I have a notebook with Ubuntu installed, and an Intel 7265N driver for WiFi and bluetooth. I cannot pair any device to it. Ubuntu finds the devices, but doesn't get their name, and doesn't allow me to pair them either. Is there a fix for this? Should it be working? Thanks! -- Luis Pablo

[PATCH] [ath10k] go back to using dma_alloc_coherent() for firmware scratch memory.

2017-05-01 Thread Adrian Chadd
This reverts b057886524be060021e3cfad0ba8458c850330cd in 2015 which converted this allocation from dma_map_coherent() to kzalloc() / dma_map_single(). The current problem manifests when using later model NICs with larger (>700KiB) scratch spaces in memory. Although the kzalloc call succeeds, the

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mwifiex: pcie: add card_reset() support

2017-05-01 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 12:37:00PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > Similar to the SDIO driver, we should implement this so that we will > automatically reset the device whenever there's a command timeout or > similar. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov > --- > v3: keep a

Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mwifiex: initiate card-specific work atomically

2017-05-01 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 12:36:59PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > The non-atomic test + set is a little awkward here, and it technically > means we might double-schedule work unnecessarily. AFAICT, this is not > really a problem, since the extra "work" will be a no-op (the flag(s) > will be cleared b

[PATCH v3 1/2] mwifiex: initiate card-specific work atomically

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Norris
The non-atomic test + set is a little awkward here, and it technically means we might double-schedule work unnecessarily. AFAICT, this is not really a problem, since the extra "work" will be a no-op (the flag(s) will be cleared by then), but it's still an anti-pattern. Rewrite this to use the atom

[PATCH v3 2/2] mwifiex: pcie: add card_reset() support

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Norris
Similar to the SDIO driver, we should implement this so that we will automatically reset the device whenever there's a command timeout or similar. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- v3: keep all the new reset code in patch 2, not patch 1 v2: use atomic test/set, based on Dmitry's suggestion --- dr

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mwifiex: initiate card-specific work atomically

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Norris
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:45:48AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > The non-atomic test + set is a little awkward here, and it technically > means we might double-schedule work unnecessarily. AFAICT, this is not > really a problem, since the extra "work" will be a no-op (the flag(s) > will be cleared b

[PATCH v2 2/2] mwifiex: pcie: add card_reset() support

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Norris
Similar to the SDIO driver, we should implement this so that we will automatically reset the device whenever there's a command timeout or similar. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- v2: use atomic test/set, based on Dmitry's suggestion --- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/pcie.c | 11 ++

[PATCH v2 1/2] mwifiex: initiate card-specific work atomically

2017-05-01 Thread Brian Norris
The non-atomic test + set is a little awkward here, and it technically means we might double-schedule work unnecessarily. AFAICT, this is not really a problem, since the extra "work" will be a no-op (the flag(s) will be cleared by then), but it's still an anti-pattern. Rewrite this to use the atom

Re: [PATCH 5/9] cfg80211/nl80211: add authorized flag to roaming event

2017-05-01 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 4/28/2017 11:02 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 12:05 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: the mobility domain does not require new 802.1X authentication, but roaming to another mobility domain does. Not sure about the terminology here. Is "mobility domain" the same as "ESS" whi

Re: brcmfmac: don't warn user if requested nvram fails

2017-05-01 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 4/30/2017 9:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 27-04-17 02:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:53:57AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: Right, sorry. For the pcie device I'm looking at the name is brcmfmac4356-pcie.txt and I would like to propose to first check for "brcm