Re: [PATCH 3/8] pseries: phyp dump: use sysfs to release reserved mem

2008-02-14 Thread Manish Ahuja
Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:11:58AM -0600, Manish Ahuja wrote: > > > >> +static ssize_t >> +show_release_region(struct kset * kset, char *buf) >> +{ >> +return sprintf(buf, "ola\n"); >> +} >> + >> +static struct subsys_attribute rr = __ATTR(release_region, 0600, >> +

Re: [PATCH 2/8] pseries: phyp dump: reserve-release proof-of-concept

2008-02-14 Thread Manish Ahuja
Olof, I will run it through checkpatch before resubmitting. Thanks, Manish Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > >> Hi Manish, >> Sorry for the minor nits but this should be: >> >> --- >> * Linas Vepstas, Manish Ahuja 2008 >> * Copyrigh

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fb: add support for foreign endianness

2008-02-14 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:44:32 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch adds support for the framebuffers with non-native > endianness. This is done via FBINFO_FOREIGN_ENDIAN flag that will > be used by the drivers. Depending on the host endianness this flag > will be overwritten

Re: [PATCH 04/11] [RFC][GPIOLIB] add gpio_set_dedicated() routine

2008-02-14 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 03 February 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:22:08PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > [...] > > > So when you assume that a GPIO number can uniquely specify a pin for > > use in function multiplexing ... you're stressing a "nonportable" > > aspect of this issue. >

a question on an error of building 2.6.24.2

2008-02-14 Thread Jingyu Liu
Hi there, I am using a cross-compiler gcc 4.1.2 and glibc 2.3.6 to build 2.6.24.2 for a adder875 board. At the end of building, the ld gives the following error messages: LD init/built-in.o LD vmlinux `.exit.data' referenced in section `.exit.text' of drivers/built-in.o: defined in

dtc: Fold comment handling test into testsuite

2008-02-14 Thread David Gibson
For ages dtc has included a sample dts, comment-test.dts, for checking various lexical corner cases in comment processing. In fact, it predates the automated testsuite, and has never been integrated into it. This patch addresses this oversight, folding the comment handling test in with the rest o

Re: [PATCH 3/8] pseries: phyp dump: use sysfs to release reserved mem

2008-02-14 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:11:58AM -0600, Manish Ahuja wrote: > +static ssize_t > +show_release_region(struct kset * kset, char *buf) > +{ > + return sprintf(buf, "ola\n"); > +} > + > +static struct subsys_attribute rr = __ATTR(release_region, 0600, > + s

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:21:52 -0600 Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:58:22PM -0600, Becky Bruce wrote: > > > Thanks for picking up the patches from Kumar and myself and fitting > > them into your series - this is much appreciated. FYI, I applied the > >

RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Enable correct operation of serial ports withnonzero regshift.

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
gcc knows better. :) > -Original Message- > From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:27 PM > To: Stephen Neuendorffer > Cc: Pavel Kiryukhin; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Enable correct operation of serial ports with

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Enable correct operation of serial ports withnonzero regshift.

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:55:31 -0800 "Stephen Neuendorffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c > > + /* get regshift if present*/ > > + regshift = get_property(np, "reg-shift", NULL); > > of_get_property, pres

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

2008-02-14 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:58:22PM -0600, Becky Bruce wrote: > Thanks for picking up the patches from Kumar and myself and fitting > them into your series - this is much appreciated. FYI, I applied the > entire patch series to my local tree and test-booted both mpc8641 and > mpc8568mds and

Re: [PATCH 2/8] pseries: phyp dump: reserve-release proof-of-concept

2008-02-14 Thread Olof Johansson
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 02:46:21PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > Hi Manish, > Sorry for the minor nits but this should be: > > --- > * Linas Vepstas, Manish Ahuja 2008 > * Copyright 2008 IBM Corp. > --- > > You can optionally use the '??' symbol after word 'Copyright' but you > shouldn't u

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread Martin Mares
> X now uses sysfs when available, therefore I think it's > best not to try and muck with this deprecated interface > if possible. However, the interface is fatally broken on machines with domains and the breakage is visible (e.g., run lspci when /sys is not mounted). I originally intended to jus

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread David Miller
From: Martin Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:45:14 +0100 > But thanks for the tip, I will check X before I post the patch. X now uses sysfs when available, therefore I think it's best not to try and muck with this deprecated interface if possible. _

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

2008-02-14 Thread David Miller
From: Josh Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:24:48 -0600 > I plan on actually testing this on Ebony, Walnut, and Bamboo either > later tonight or tomorrow. I don't expect many issues. > > Dave, those above boards would cover the build of PowerPC 4xx CPU cores. Ok.

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:43:05PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Martin Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:40:22 +0100 > > > Would it be acceptable for the PPC folks to modify the code to add > > domain numbers to the device numbers in /proc/bus/pci/devices in the > > same

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

2008-02-14 Thread David Miller
From: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:58:22 -0600 > Thanks for picking up the patches from Kumar and myself and fitting > them into your series - this is much appreciated. FYI, I applied the > entire patch series to my local tree and test-booted both mpc8641 and >

Please pull powerpc.git merge branch

2008-02-14 Thread Paul Mackerras
Linus, Please do git pull \ git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git merge to get a collection of bug-fixes and very minor cleanups for powerpc (plus one commit wiring up the timerfd syscalls). Thanks, Paul. arch/powerpc/Kconfig |4 --- arch/p

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread Martin Mares
Hi! > > Be careful, things like the X server parse that file, and X's > > parser does not expect domain numbers there so you will break > > things :-( > > It might be best if we only place domain 0 in that file. Yes, that's another possilibity. However, in such cases we should probably create th

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread Martin Mares
Hi! > > Would it be acceptable for the PPC folks to modify the code to add > > domain numbers to the device numbers in /proc/bus/pci/devices in the > > same format as the bus directories already have? > > Be careful, things like the X server parse that file, and X's > parser does not expect domai

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread David Miller
From: Martin Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:40:22 +0100 > Would it be acceptable for the PPC folks to modify the code to add > domain numbers to the device numbers in /proc/bus/pci/devices in the > same format as the bus directories already have? Be careful, things like the X

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

2008-02-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:58:22 -0600 Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, David Miller wrote: > > > > > I've taken into consideration the various feedback, and > > ported the bug fix and other LMB patches posted recently > > in an effort to keep the patch churn b

Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Respun LMB patches.

2008-02-14 Thread Becky Bruce
On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, David Miller wrote: > > I've taken into consideration the various feedback, and > ported the bug fix and other LMB patches posted recently > in an effort to keep the patch churn by others down wrt. > my moving of these files. > > 1) Use HAVE_LMB as suggested by Sam. >

Re: [PATCH 05/11] ppc/mpc8xx: remove ppc_ide_md hooks

2008-02-14 Thread Vitaly Bordug
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:36:56 +0100 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > * Initialize IDE ports in mpc8xx_ide_probe(). > > * Remove m8xx_ide_init() and ppc_ide_md hooks - no need for them > (IDE mpc8xx host driver takes care of all this setup). > > * Remove needless 'if (irq)' and 'if (data_port

RE: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Enable correct operation of serial ports withnonzero regshift.

2008-02-14 Thread Stephen Neuendorffer
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/legacy_serial.c > + /* get regshift if present*/ > + regshift = get_property(np, "reg-shift", NULL); of_get_property, presumably? --- a/drivers/serial/of_serial.c +++ b/drivers/serial/of_serial.c > + regshift = g

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:40 am Martin Mares wrote: > Hi Greg! > > > I have no idea, it sounds like a PPC specific thing, not anything the > > PCI core does, right? So I'll add the ppc list to the cc: and ask if > > anyone there has any ideas? > > Unfortunately, this is not PPC specific at

[PATCH 04/14] arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c: Use time_* macros

2008-02-14 Thread S . Çağlar Onur
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values. So following patch implements usage of the time_after() macro, defined at linux/jiffies.h, which deals with wrapping correctly Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Signed-

Re: [PATCH] drivers/base: export gpl (un)register_memory_notifier

2008-02-14 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:36 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > I am not sure what you are trying to do with walk_memory_resource(). > The > behavior is different on ppc64. Hotplug memory usage assumes that all > the memory resources (all system memory, not just IOMEM) are > represented > in /proc

Re: [PATCH] drivers/base: export gpl (un)register_memory_notifier

2008-02-14 Thread Badari Pulavarty
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:12 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: .. > > > > - Use currently other not exported functions in kernel/resource.c, like > > > > walk_memory_resource (where we would still need the maximum > > > possible number > > > > of pages NR_MEM_SECTIONS) > > > > > > It isn't the act of ex

Re: [PATCH] drivers/base: export gpl (un)register_memory_notifier

2008-02-14 Thread Dave Hansen
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:46 +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote: > Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13.02.2008 18:05:00: > > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 16:17 +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > > > Constraints imposed by HW / FW: > > > - eHEA has own MMU > > > - eHEA Memory Regions (MRs) are used by th

[PATCH] Fix ucc_geth MII master selection

2008-02-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Remove bogus UCC regs range test and correct off by one error in call to ucc_set_qe_mux_mii_mng() Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- I am not 100% sure this is the correct fix, please ACK or NACK drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c | 26 +++--- 1 files changed,

BUG: ucc_geth, MDIO only works for UCC3([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on MPC8321

2008-02-14 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Trying to use other UCC2 or UCC4 for ethernet instead of UCC3 makes MDIO unusable. UCC2 can not find its PHY if not UCC3 is present too. Seems like only UCC3 is able to drive the MDIO bus. Jocke ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org http

Re: [PATCH] emac/zmii link warnings

2008-02-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:08:33 -0500 Sean MacLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, here is my best shot at removing the warnings. It seems to me that > functions called from a dev_init section should not be dev_exit. This seems to fix those specific warnings, but there are others lurking in some

Re: [PATCH] remove unused CONFIG_WANT_DEVICE_TREE

2008-02-14 Thread Josh Boyer
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:14:09 -0700 Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE was the only user of CONFIG_WANT_DEVICE_TREE but > it was removed in commit id 25431333813686654907ab987fb5de10c10a16db > (bootwrapper: Build multiple cuImage

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Enable correct operation of serial ports with nonzero regshift.

2008-02-14 Thread Kumar Gala
On Feb 14, 2008, at 3:10 AM, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: >> >>> Add regshift reading to serial drivers. >>> This enables correct operation of serial ports with nonzero >>> regshift. >> >> what device needs this? >> >> - k

Re: libfdt: Fix NOP handling bug in fdt_add_subnode_namelen()

2008-02-14 Thread Jon Loeliger
So, like, the other day David Gibson mumbled: > fdt_add_subnode_namelen() has a bug if asked to add a subnode to a > node which has NOP tags interspersed with its properties. In this > case fdt_add_subnode_namelen() will put the new subnode before the > first NOP tag, even if there are properties

Re: [PATCH/RFC] [POWERPC] Add i2c pins to dts and board setup on 01-31-08

2008-02-14 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Nima, > I've got a couple of comments about the above patch - I'm not quite sure > how to add my comments to the ozlab.org site. simply replying to the original mail will add your comments. > 1 - > -- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8272ads.dts > [snip] > + [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /proc/bus/pci and domains

2008-02-14 Thread Martin Mares
Hi Greg! > I have no idea, it sounds like a PPC specific thing, not anything the > PCI core does, right? So I'll add the ppc list to the cc: and ask if > anyone there has any ideas? Unfortunately, this is not PPC specific at all -- proc_attach_device() calls pci_proc_domain(bus), which is an arc

Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc1-git1 softlockup while bootup on powerpc

2008-02-14 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> While booting with the 2.6.25-rc1-git1 kernel on the powerbox the >> softlockup is seen, with following trace. > >> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [insmod:377] >> TASK = c0077cb2f0e0[377] 'insmod' THREAD: c0

Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Enable correct operation of serial ports with nonzero regshift.

2008-02-14 Thread Pavel Kiryukhin
Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Pavel Kiryukhin wrote: > >> Add regshift reading to serial drivers. >> This enables correct operation of serial ports with nonzero regshift. > > what device needs this? > > - k Xilinx opb 16550 uart -- Pavel _

Re: [PATCH] drivers/base: export gpl (un)register_memory_notifier

2008-02-14 Thread Christoph Raisch
Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13.02.2008 18:05:00: > On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 16:17 +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote: > > Constraints imposed by HW / FW: > > - eHEA has own MMU > > - eHEA Memory Regions (MRs) are used by the eHEA MMU to translate virtual > > addresses to absolute addres