On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:19:17PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:27:49PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >> There are some DWC OTG parameters which might be passed by a platform.
> >> Declaration for structure of those p
On 09/02/2011 01:29 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 09/01/2011 10:21 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Is the "PowerPC" vendor string still appropriate here, or should we use
"fsl"?
>>>
>>> I have
On Sep 2, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 09/01/2011 10:21 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other
e500mc based SoCs used P
On 09/01/2011 10:21 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 1, 2011, at 3:42 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
>> On 09/01/2011 02:26 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> The P4080 silicon device tree was using PowerPC,4080 while the other
>>> e500mc based SoCs used PowerPC,e500mc. Use the core name to be
>>> consistent go
пишет:
<
<> I will send you those patches.
<> But, how to go about it? Will you send next revision of your patces
<> soon, and will also include comments for current review?
<>
<> Or,
<>
<> I replly all the comments from community and get agreed about
<> modifications first.
<> Then I will release
<
From your changes.
Regards,
Marri
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
From: Stephen George
Adding new device tree binding file for the DCSR node. Modifying device
tree dtsi files to add DCSR node for P2041, P3041, P3060, P4080, & P5020.
Signed-off-by: Stephen George
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
v2:
* include dscr.txt binding spec
* moved around dcsr nodes to k
> There can be some peripheral like dwc-otg, whose registers will be
> either in LE or in BE
> depending on the RTL configuration selected by a implementor.
> Software always expects a LE value when it will call "in_" and will
> provide a LE value when "out_".
> It expects beacuse , it wants to do
В Fri, 2 Sep 2011 17:12:17 +0530
Pratyush Anand пишет:
> I will send you those patches.
> But, how to go about it? Will you send next revision of your patces soon, and
> will also include comments for current review?
>
> Or,
>
> I replly all the comments from community and get agreed about
> mo
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> On 09/02/2011 01:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>>>
>>> oh boy, oh boy. This is a huge number of module parameters. Do you
>>> actually expect someone setting all of them on modprobe? And if udev is
>>> faster you rmmod and modpobe a
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:27:49PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> There are some DWC OTG parameters which might be passed by a platform.
>> Declaration for structure of those parameters have been provided in this
>> include file.
>>
>> Signed-off-b
I will send you those patches.
But, how to go about it? Will you send next revision of your patces soon, and
will also include comments for current review?
Or,
I replly all the comments from community and get agreed about
modifications first.
Then I will release next revision with all these modif
On 09/02/2011 01:17 PM, Pratyush Anand wrote:
oh boy, oh boy. This is a huge number of module parameters. Do you
actually expect someone setting all of them on modprobe? And if udev is
faster you rmmod and modpobe again, right? The clever ones would enter
it somewhere in modprobe.conf or so. Anyw
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 4:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:27:48PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> From: Tirumala Marri
>>
>> Add Synopsys Design Ware core register definitions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tirumala R Marri
>> Signed-off-by: Fushen Chen
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> * Pratyush Anand | 2011-08-30 17:27:55 [+0530]:
>>diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc/pcd.c b/drivers/usb/dwc/pcd.c
>>new file mode 100644
>>index 000..2ef6405
>>--- /dev/null
>>+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc/pcd.c
>>+static const struct usb_
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> * Pratyush Anand | 2011-08-30 17:27:50 [+0530]:
>
>>diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c b/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c
>>new file mode 100644
>>index 000..80ea274
>>--- /dev/null
>>+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc/apmppc.c
>>@@ -0,0 +1,43
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 17:28 +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> There are some peripheral(e.g dwc otg) whose registers can be configured to
> work in either little or big endian mode. Therefor macros like out_be32,
> in_be32, out_le32 and in_le32 have been added to support such peripherals.
Yuck.
Don'
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> * Pratyush Anand | 2011-08-30 17:28:01 [+0530]:
>
>>diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
>>index 815efa2..32282b4 100644
>>--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
>>+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/io.h
>>@@ -297,6
Hi Rob, Grant,
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 18:22:36 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Grant,
>
> On 08/05/2011 05:54 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 04:24:26PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> From: Rob Herring
> >>
> >> All callers of of_i2c_register_devices are immediately preceded by a ca
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:31:22PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Audio support for the MPC5200 exists, so enable it by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi
Yup, I like to have the PCM030 in a working state
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/15/2011 10:59 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 12:48 +0800, b35...@freescale.com wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * Hack for supporting the flash chip whose writesize is
>>> + * larger than 2K bytes.
>>> + */
>>> +
21 matches
Mail list logo
