On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:25:14AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list Linuxppc-dev
>
> We have received a request for the removal of your email address,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from the linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org mailing list.
> To confirm that y
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:25:14AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list Linuxppc-dev
>
> We have received a request for the removal of your email address,
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from the linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org mailing list.
> To confirm that y
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 08:35:36AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Since OLS is next week I figured I see who around here is going.
>
> I'm always interested in putting faces to names and having a lively
> discussions over beer.
>
> So if your headed to OLS respond to this thread and maybe we'll have a
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:33:00AM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> Did you check out the cards on x86 and ascertain that they have the
> standard PCI header in them? 55 AA All PCI ROMs are supposed to
> have that. If they are missing that the size code in the rom.c isn't
> going to work right.
See m
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:20:14AM +0100, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > Regarding the sub-thread on x86 emulation, that is totally out of scope
> > for this. The 'AtomBIOS' of the ATI cards, consists of multiple parts (I
> > may have minor errors here, ask airlied if you need more
> > clarification):
>
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:41:01AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I was looking around for a description of the ROM layout, and instead I
> found this: http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn2000.html
> It was relevant because it explicitly mentioned enabling the
> PCI_COMMAND_M
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 08:30:58AM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> I don't know PPC at this low of level but it may be a problem with non
> word-aligned access to memory. I thought readb() was supposed to work
> on all archs and alignment issues are handled inside readb(). Also,
> the readw() may have an
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 03:15:35AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I started in there from that, and ended up in pci-sysfs.c...
> The ROM memcpy in drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:pci_read_rom() is never running.
...
> [ 306.396743] drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c:577:pci_read_rom: size=0
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 09:13:40PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> The ROM is mapped in drivers/pci/rom.c
>
> You could add some printks and see if there is an error and if the ROM
> is accessible
>
> rom = ioremap(start, *size);
> if (!rom) {
> /* restore enable if iore
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:42:42AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I put the card into an amd64 box, found the relevant 'rom' node ($ROM) under
> > /sys/device/pci*, and dumped it as follows:
> >
Following up from initial conversation with benh in #ppc64, I did a bit
of testing (and then a bit more).
Two PCIe cards for my testing:
a) sata_sil24 eSATA (x86 BIOS)
b) ATI X700 graphics (x86 BIOS)
I put the card into an amd64 box, found the relevant 'rom' node ($ROM) under
/sys/device/pci*, an
11 matches
Mail list logo
