Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:23:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Kumar, >>> >>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:07:47 -0500 Kumar Gala >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > I'm confused

Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Grant Likely
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:23:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: >> >> Hi Kumar, >> >> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:07:47 -0500 Kumar Gala >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > I'm confused by the proposed fix as we already have *mdio & *ph >> > defined in th

Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:23:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell > wrote: Hi Kumar, On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:07:47 -0500 Kumar Gala > wrote: I'm confused by the proposed fix as we already have *mdio & *ph defined in this function: Which tree are you

Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:23:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Kumar, > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:07:47 -0500 Kumar Gala > wrote: > > > > > > I'm confused by the proposed fix as we already have *mdio & *ph > > defined in this function: > > Which tree are you looking at? Linus' tree, and

Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Kumar, On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:07:47 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > > > I'm confused by the proposed fix as we already have *mdio & *ph > defined in this function: Which tree are you looking at? Linus' tree, and linux-next, do not have those local variables ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell

Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Kumar Gala
: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type ph should be declared const phandle *. Look at other uses of of_get_property. Ok fine. Here is a revised patch again. Subject: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o] Refer

[PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-17 Thread Subrata Modak
; > CC [M] drivers/net/ucc_geth.o > > > > drivers/net/ucc_geth.c: In function bucc_geth_probeb: > > > > drivers/net/ucc_geth.c:3824: warning: assignment discards qualifiers > > > > from pointer target type > > > > > > ph should be decla

Re: [PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-14 Thread Subrata Modak
> > > > > Stephen, > > > > > > True. But without this gcc complains: > > > > > > CC [M] drivers/net/ucc_geth.o > > > drivers/net/ucc_geth.c: In function bucc_geth_probeb: > > > drivers/net/ucc_geth.c:3824: warning: assignment disc

[PATCH][Resend 2][BUILD FAILURE 04/04] Next June 04:PPC64 randconfig [drivers/net/ucc_geth.o]

2009-06-10 Thread Subrata Modak
t/ucc_geth.c: In function ‘ucc_geth_probe’: > > drivers/net/ucc_geth.c:3824: warning: assignment discards qualifiers > > from pointer target type > > ph should be declared const phandle *. Look at other uses of > of_get_property. > Ok fine. Here is a revised patch a