: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: supply a .disable callback
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 13:38 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
> > > From: Wang Dongsheng
> > >
> > > Currently MPIC provides .mask, but no
21; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: supply a .disable callback
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 13:38 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
> > > From: Wang Dongsheng
> > >
> > > Currently MPIC provides .mask, but not .disable. Th
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [mailto:b...@kernel.crashing.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 1:50 PM
> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: supply a .disable ca
> -Original Message-
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:39 PM
> To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> Cc: b...@kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpic: supply a .disable callback
>
> On Tue, 2
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 13:38 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Dongsheng
Why did you change the author field?
-Scott
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 13:38 +0800, Dongsheng Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Dongsheng
>
> Currently MPIC provides .mask, but not .disable. This means that
> effectively disable_irq() soft-disables the interrupt, and you get
> a .mask call if an interrupt actually occurs.
>
> I'm not sure if this was
From: Wang Dongsheng
Currently MPIC provides .mask, but not .disable. This means that
effectively disable_irq() soft-disables the interrupt, and you get
a .mask call if an interrupt actually occurs.
I'm not sure if this was intended as a performance benefit (it seems common
to omit .disable on
