There was a bug for fmr initialization, which lead to fmr was always 0x100
in fsl_elbc_chip_init() and caused FCM command timeout before calling
fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail().
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu
---
drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.c |8 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 dele
There was a bug for fmr initialization, which lead to fmr was always 0x100
in fsl_elbc_chip_init() and caused FCM command timeout before calling
fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail(), now we initialize CWTO to maximum timeout value
and not relying on the setting of bootloader.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu
-
On 12/05/2011 04:54 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> There was a bug for fmr initialization, which lead to fmr was always 0x100
> in fsl_elbc_chip_init() and caused FCM command timeout before calling
> fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail().
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_elbc_nand.
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 17:40 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> There was a bug for fmr initialization, which lead to fmr was always 0x100
> in fsl_elbc_chip_init() and caused FCM command timeout before calling
> fsl_elbc_chip_init_tail(), now we initialize CWTO to maximum timeout value
> and not relyin
.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd/nand: fixup for fmr initialization of
> Freescale NAND controller
>
> On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 17:40 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> > There was a bug for fmr initialization, which lead to fmr was always
> > 0x100 in fsl_elbc_chip_in
org; Wood Scott-B07421;
> > dw...@infradead.org; Gala Kumar-B11780; linux-...@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mtd/nand: fixup for fmr initialization of
> > Freescale NAND controller
> >
> > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 17:40 +0800, Shengzhou Liu wrote:
> >
