On 02/11/2014 05:09 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for the review.
On 02/11/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 02/07/2014 09:06 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner
On some architectures, in certain CPU deep idle states the local
timers stop.
An e
On 02/11/2014 04:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 02/07/2014 09:06 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Setting the smp affinity on the earliest timer should be handled automatically
with the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ flag. Did you look at using this flag ?
How sho
Hi Daniel,
Thank you very much for the review.
On 02/11/2014 03:46 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 09:06 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> From: Thomas Gleixner
>>
>> On some architectures, in certain CPU deep idle states the local
>> timers stop.
>> An external clock device is used to wak
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/07/2014 09:06 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Setting the smp affinity on the earliest timer should be handled automatically
> with the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DYNIRQ flag. Did you look at using this flag ?
How should this flag help? Not at all, because the h
On 02/07/2014 09:06 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner
On some architectures, in certain CPU deep idle states the local timers stop.
An external clock device is used to wakeup these CPUs. The kernel support for
the
wakeup of these CPUs is provided by the tick broadcast framework
From: Thomas Gleixner
On some architectures, in certain CPU deep idle states the local timers stop.
An external clock device is used to wakeup these CPUs. The kernel support for
the
wakeup of these CPUs is provided by the tick broadcast framework by using the
external clock device as the wakeup