Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpuidle: rework device state count handling

2014-01-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 01:37:29 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, December 20, 2013 07:47:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where > > device->state_count is smaller than driver->state_count, unfortun

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpuidle: rework device state count handling

2014-01-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, December 20, 2013 07:47:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Hi, > > Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where > device->state_count is smaller than driver->state_count, unfortunately > currently this is untrue (device->state_count is used only for handli

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpuidle: rework device state count handling

2014-01-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, December 20, 2013 07:47:22 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Hi, > > Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where > device->state_count is smaller than driver->state_count, unfortunately > currently this is untrue (device->state_count is used only for handli

[PATCH v2 0/9] cpuidle: rework device state count handling

2013-12-20 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, Some cpuidle drivers assume that cpuidle core will handle cases where device->state_count is smaller than driver->state_count, unfortunately currently this is untrue (device->state_count is used only for handling cpuidle state sysfs entries and driver->state_count is used for all other cases)