On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:14:00PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 07/04/2013 07:54:07 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
index a92c79b..2201f84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
On 07/04/2013 07:54:07 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
index a92c79b..2201f84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fsl_booke_entry_mapping.S
@@ -88,9
The e500v1 doesn't implement the MAS7, so we should avoid to access
this register on that implementations. Some code use the
CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT to protect these accesses, but this is not accurate.
In theory we can enable the CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT for a e500v1 board and
the CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is also