Hi Kumar,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:21:18AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus
> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>
> This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500
> systems
> depend o
On 11-08-10 12:01 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 10:39 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6,
>>> thus
>>> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>>>
>>> This patc
On 08/10/2011 10:39 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6,
>> thus
>> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>>
>> This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc,
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus
> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
>
> This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500
> systems
> depend on PPC_E500_V1_V2.
I
CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus
breaking clear_pages(), probably others too.
This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500 systems
depend on PPC_E500_V1_V2.
Cc: Kumar Gala
Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach
---
Changes from v2: