Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc

2011-10-24 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Kumar, On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:21:18AM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500 > systems > depend o

Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc

2011-08-10 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On 11-08-10 12:01 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 08/10/2011 10:39 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: >>> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, >>> thus >>> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. >>> >>> This patc

Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc

2011-08-10 Thread Scott Wood
On 08/10/2011 10:39 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: >> CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, >> thus >> breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. >> >> This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc,

Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc

2011-08-10 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: > CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus > breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. > > This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500 > systems > depend on PPC_E500_V1_V2. I

[PATCH v3] powerpc: 85xx: separate e500 from e500mc

2011-08-09 Thread Baruch Siach
CONFIG_E500MC breaks e500/e500v2 systems. It defines L1_CACHE_SHIFT to 6, thus breaking clear_pages(), probably others too. This patch adds a new "Processor Type" entry for e500mc, and makes e500 systems depend on PPC_E500_V1_V2. Cc: Kumar Gala Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach --- Changes from v2: