* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/07/16 22:28), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> >> (2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>>
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> > Reported-by:
(2014/07/16 22:28), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>> (2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> Reported-by: Tony Luck
> Tested-by: Tony Luck
> Cc
* Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> >>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> >>> Reported-by: Tony Luck
> >>> Tested-by: Tony Luck
> >>> Cc: Michael Ellerman
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Mich
(2014/07/15 16:16), Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
>>> Reported-by: Tony Luck
>>> Tested-by: Tony Luck
>>> Cc: Michael Ellerman
>>
>> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman
>> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (f
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 13:19 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu
> > Reported-by: Tony Luck
> > Tested-by: Tony Luck
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman
>
> Tested-by: Michael Ellerman
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (for powerpc)
>
> Ben, can you take this in your tree?
A
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 07:00 +, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
> entry address of the function, but the address of function
> discriptor (which contains the entry address and misc
> data.) Since the kprobes passes the function pointer stored
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:24 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/07/15 11:11), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
> >> wrote:
> >>> Ping?
> >>>
> >>> This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will
(2014/07/15 11:11), Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
>> wrote:
>>> Ping?
>>>
>>> This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
>>
>> Is somebody going to push this upstream? A
On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
> wrote:
> > Ping?
> >
> > This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
>
> Is somebody going to push this upstream? Another week has gone by,
> we are at -rc5, and I'
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Masami Hiramatsu
wrote:
> Ping?
>
> This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Is somebody going to push this upstream? Another week has gone by,
we are at -rc5, and I'm still seeing the
Failed to find blacklist a0010133b150
mes
Ping?
This patch can be applied without 1/2, and will fix ia64/ppc64 problem.
Thank you,
(2014/07/02 16:00), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On ia64 and ppc64, the function pointer does not point the
> entry address of the function, but the address of function
> discriptor (which contains the entry ad
11 matches
Mail list logo
