Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 04:36:51PM +0100, Seth Mos wrote: > Hi, > > Op 20 nov 2011, om 16:33 heeft Eugen Leitl het volgende geschreven: > > > Great, I'll take the plunge, then. Thanks! > > Just for extra clarification, the images on > http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ipv6/ are the easiest to start

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:21:08AM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 04:36:51PM +0100, Seth Mos wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Op 20 nov 2011, om 16:33 heeft Eugen Leitl het volgende geschreven: > > > > > Great, I'll take the plunge, then. Thanks! > > > > Just for extra clarification,

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:39:00AM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe02:1a4e%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 > inet6 2a01:4f8:7d:300:: prefixlen 56 > > Anyone knows how disable IPv6 autoconfig in pfSense? Sorry, I'm an idiot, disregard. Assigned the wrong IPv6 add

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > Hmm, I'm getting IPv6 autoconfig bullshit overriding my > static configuration: > >        inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe02:1a4e%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >        inet6 2a01:4f8:7d:300:: prefixlen 56 > > Anyone knows how disable IPv6 autoconfig

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/23/2011 4:21 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > Just upgraded to > http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ipv6/pfSense-Full-Update-2.1-DEVELOPMENT-i386-20111021-1243.tgz > on a SuperMicro Atom -- system boots fine but I'm getting > Crash report begins. Anonymous machine information: [snip] > Is this of any co

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:22:16AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 11/23/2011 4:21 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > Just upgraded to > > http://files.pfsense.org/jimp/ipv6/pfSense-Full-Update-2.1-DEVELOPMENT-i386-20111021-1243.tgz > > on a SuperMicro Atom -- system boots fine but I'm getting > > Crash rep

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/23/2011 10:36 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > Thanks -- did that, and rebooted. [snip] > Crash report details: > Did you submit the report? If so, did it give you an error when it submitted? Jim ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:42:41AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 11/23/2011 10:36 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > Thanks -- did that, and rebooted. > [snip] > > Crash report details: > > > > Did you submit the report? If so, did it give you an error when it > submitted? Yes, submitted, and no error g

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/23/2011 10:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:42:41AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: >> On 11/23/2011 10:36 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: >>> Thanks -- did that, and rebooted. >> [snip] >>> Crash report details: >>> >> >> Did you submit the report? If so, did it give you an error when

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:52:45AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 11/23/2011 10:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:42:41AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: > >> On 11/23/2011 10:36 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > >>> Thanks -- did that, and rebooted. > >> [snip] > >>> Crash report details: >

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Jim Pingle
On 11/23/2011 11:09 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > I did see something like that. Just repeated the > above, and it seems the last sync did succeed: > > # pfSsh.php playback gitsync master > > Starting the pfSense shell system... > > ===> Checking out master > ===> Fetching updates... >

Re: [pfSense] how stable is IPv6 for 2.0?

2011-11-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:44:56AM -0500, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 11/23/2011 11:09 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > I did see something like that. Just repeated the > > above, and it seems the last sync did succeed: > > > > # pfSsh.php playback gitsync master > > > > Starting the pfSense shell system.

[pfSense] Replacing CheckPoint Firewall-1 with pfSense

2011-11-23 Thread Ugo Bellavance
Hi, We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. We are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65): - Security (default deny on everything) - NAT (inbound (for internet-facing hosts) and outbound (selective, workstations go out through a proxy, other selected hosts

Re: [pfSense] Load Balancer: Virtual Servers vs DHCP assigned dynamic IP addresses

2011-11-23 Thread Dave Warren
On 11/22/2011 5:11 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: On 11/22/2011 7:45 PM, Dave Warren wrote: Is there any way to tell pfSense that these entries should represent interface IPs rather than hardcoding specific IPs? I don't recall if we reject the syntax in the GUI, but I believe relayd supports using a hos

[pfSense] Unstable RDC connections

2011-11-23 Thread Ron Lemon
Good Afternoon, I have an odd problem that I am hoping someone might be able to assist me with. I have a pfSense 2 box with 2 NICs in it. WAN and LAN. The LAN has 3 subnets on it 10.0.0.0/24, 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.4.0/24. 1. If I sit in 10.0.1.0 I can connect to an RDC server in the sa

Re: [pfSense] Replacing CheckPoint Firewall-1 with pfSense

2011-11-23 Thread Nathan Eisenberg
> Hi, > > We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. > We > are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65): Based on your requirements, you'll be quite happy with PFSense. ___ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http:

Re: [pfSense] Replacing CheckPoint Firewall-1 with pfSense

2011-11-23 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Ugo Bellavance wrote: > We're thinking about replacing our CheckPoint Firewall-1 by pfSense. We > are using only those features on Firewall-1 (R65): > Concerns: > 3- Backups. Are automated backups (of the config, at least) possible even > w/o a service contrac

[pfSense] NAT reflection and SIP registration

2011-11-23 Thread David Burgess
I have the SIP client in my Android 2.3 phone set up to register to my local Askozia (Asterisk) PBX. The problem I'm having is that if I use the FQDN of the PBX server, the SIP client only registers when I'm off the network. In order to have the SIP client register successfully when on the local ne

Re: [pfSense] Unstable RDC connections

2011-11-23 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Ron Lemon wrote: > > Good Afternoon, > > > > I have an odd problem that I am hoping someone might be able to assist me > with.  I have a pfSense 2 box with 2 NICs in it.  WAN and LAN.  The LAN has 3 > subnets on it 10.0.0.0/24, 10.0.1.0/24 and 10.0.4.0/24. > > >

Re: [pfSense] Multiple IPSEC Mutual PSK + Xauth Tunnels

2011-11-23 Thread Daniel Davis
Bump... any ideas? From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Davis Sent: Wednesday, 2 November 2011 3:09 PM To: 'pfSense support and discussion' Subject: [pfSense] Multiple IPSEC Mutual PSK + Xauth Tunnels We have a situation where all our i

Re: [pfSense] Replacing CheckPoint Firewall-1 with pfSense

2011-11-23 Thread Daniel Davis
> -Original Message- > From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list- > boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance > Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2011 4:04 AM > To: list@lists.pfsense.org > Subject: [pfSense] Replacing CheckPoint Firewall-1 with pfSense > > Hi, > > We're

Re: [pfSense] Multiple IPSEC Mutual PSK + Xauth Tunnels

2011-11-23 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Daniel Davis wrote: > We have a situation where all our iOS users connect via IPSEC VPN for remote > access. This works great and is very stable. What we want to achieve however > is for certain clients to have access only to certain networks (different > sets of fi