Re: [WSG] List headings

No, you would use a css ;0)On 10/07/06, Lea de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If you just want it bold you can style it that way in the CSS>> which I am sure you know already.pepelsbey wrote:> Yep. CSS, i know ;)> STRONG just for visual emphasis of DT in unstyled content. >> Not so necessary,

Re: [WSG] List headings

If you just want it bold you can style it that way in the CSS which I am sure you know already. pepelsbey wrote: Yep. CSS, i know ;) STRONG just for visual emphasis of DT in unstyled content. Not so necessary, but looks nice. Hmmm, interesting - I think I would use hoary old if all I wanted

Re: [WSG] List headings

If you just want it bold you can style it that way in the CSS which I am sure you know already. Yep. CSS, i know ;) STRONG just for visual emphasis of DT in unstyled content. Not so necessary, but looks nice. -- Regards, pepelsbey. http://pepelsbey.net **

Re: [WSG] List headings

lsbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Monday, 10 July, 2006 9:40:53 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] List headings > Specifically: > Pity : \ So... best two solutions, i think: Title Item Item and Title Item Item or with STRONG Title Ite

Re: [WSG] List headings

Specifically: Pity : \ So... best two solutions, i think: Title Item Item and Title Item Item or with STRONG Title Item Item -- С уважением, pepelsbey. http://pepelsbey.net ** The discussion list for http://webst

Re: [WSG] List headings

> > Group title > Group item > Group item > Group item > Unfortunately, this is invalid. You can also use block level elements in the definition description, such as the and elements. But you cannot use block level elements inside a definition term. More here:

Re: [WSG] List headings

On Monday 10 July 2006 16:43, pepelsbey wrote: > Maybe: > > >Group title >Group title >Group title >Group title > > I think the best option would be: Group title Group item Group item Group item and style dt h1 { font-family: font-weight:

Re: [WSG] List headings

Maybe: Group title Group title Group title Group title Or Group title Group title Group title Group title Example with ... ... not so good, because "..." isn't "LIST ITEM", it is "TITLE of LIST ITEMS group". -- Regards, pepelsbey. http://pepelsbey.net ***

Re: [WSG] List headings

List heading Just got me thinking... what's the semantic difference in doing this and using a ? Will one be more right than the other, or is it a matter of how the label/heading fits with the rest of the document's structure?

Re: [WSG] List headings

This example says the the unordered list fits beneath the hn heading, with all other content below that heading (until new heading found). But what if I want to specify that the heading is for the list only? XHTML2 will take care of this problem for you: Higher level heading Some paragraph t

RE: [WSG] List headings

m. To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] List headings Joshua Street wrote: > > The second way (IMHO) suggests that the heading it itself a list item, > not the heading of the list. The first way creates an implicit > semantic link between content, as headers preceding pa

Re: [WSG] List headings

Joshua Street wrote: The second way (IMHO) suggests that the heading it itself a list item, not the heading of the list. The first way creates an implicit semantic link between content, as headers preceding paragraphs of text are presumed to bear a relation to the content that follows. Much the

Re: [WSG] List headings

> The second way seems to suggest a relationship between the list and the > heading that the first example doesn't? > I'd have to agree with Patrick. If you look at the document tree for the first example, you can see a heading with list items as children. This implies the correct relationship.

Re: [WSG] List headings

My vote's with the first one. The second doesn't seem right because it makes the heading a list item. On 10/07/06, Kat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: May I ask a question which to everybody else probably seems obvious? What is the best way to associate a heading with a list? List heading

Re: [WSG] List headings

Kat wrote: What is the best way to associate a heading with a list? List heading OR List heading this way? The second way seems to suggest a relationship between the list and the heading that the first example doesn't? The first example (heading before the li

Re: [WSG] List headings

On 7/10/06, Kat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What is the best way to associate a heading with a list? The second way (IMHO) suggests that the heading it itself a list item, not the heading of the list. The first way creates an implicit semantic link between content, as headers preceding paragraph

[WSG] List headings

May I ask a question which to everybody else probably seems obvious? What is the best way to associate a heading with a list? List heading OR List heading this way? The second way seems to suggest a relationship between the list and the heading that the first e