[lldb-dev] LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 Release has been tagged

2019-11-22 Thread Tom Stellard via lldb-dev
Hi, I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let me know. -Tom ___

Re: [lldb-dev] The pre-built Windows LLDB binary has a dependency on an external python36.dll?

2019-11-22 Thread Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev
FWIW, Python provides stable ABI for a subset of their API. I've actually managed to create a version of LLDB that is Python-optional and Python version-agnostic (for versions 3.3 up). Though given the number of hoops I had to jump through to get

Re: [lldb-dev] The pre-built Windows LLDB binary has a dependency on an external python36.dll?

2019-11-22 Thread Adrian McCarthy via lldb-dev
Yes, I think it's pretty reasonable to expect a specific version of Python, especially if the pre-built Python DLLs for Windows are still built with versions as old as VS 2013. Once you get to VS 2015 or 2017, I think the compatibility improves. Perhaps the best thing for the pre-built LLDB is

Re: [lldb-dev] The pre-built Windows LLDB binary has a dependency on an external python36.dll?

2019-11-22 Thread Ted Woodward via lldb-dev
> > * Dynamically load any supported Python DLL if/when needed > That might be tricky since the different versions are not binary compatible in > general. But it is possible, as Apple folks have shown, though it amounts to > building multiple copies of ScriptInterpreterPython and then choosing

[lldb-dev] EuroLLVM 2020 - Call for presentations

2019-11-22 Thread Kristof Beyls via lldb-dev
All developers and users of LLVM and related sub-projects are invited to present and discuss at the EuroLLVM'20 developers’ meeting in Paris, France. We are looking for the following proposals: 1. Technical Talks (25 minutes + 5 minutes Q): -