[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-407) Signing the assembly

Signing the assembly Key: LUCENENET-407 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-407 Project: Lucene.Net Issue Type: Improvement Components: Lucene.Net Core Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.2, L

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-407) Signing the assembly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-407: - Attachment: signing.patch Lucene.NET.snk snk file and a patch

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-408) Mark assembly as CLS compliant; make AlreadyClosedException serializable

Mark assembly as CLS compliant; make AlreadyClosedException serializable Key: LUCENENET-408 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-408 Project: Lucene.Net

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-408) Mark assembly as CLS compliant; make AlreadyClosedException serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-408: - Attachment: commit-40f81a3.patch Attaching patch > Mark assembly as CLS compl

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-408) Mark assembly as CLS compliant; make AlreadyClosedException serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012372#comment-13012372 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-408: -- Thanks. Can you apply this

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-407) Signing the assembly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012374#comment-13012374 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-407: -- That would work, thanks.

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual Key: LUCENENET-426 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426 Project: Lucene.Net Issue Type: Improvement Components: Lucene.Ne

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-426: - Attachment: fvh.patch Patch fixing this > Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods a

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053692#comment-13053692 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-426: -- I think we already went th

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENENET-426) Mark BaseFragmentsBuilder methods as virtual

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053692#comment-13053692 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko edited comment on LUCENENET-426 at 6/23/11 8:02 AM: --

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-486) Wildcard queries are not analyzed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13258931#comment-13258931 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-486: -- @Prescott no it doesn't M

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-484) Some possibly major tests intermittently fail

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13264399#comment-13264399 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-484: -- That's probably a matter o

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-489) New spatial module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Itamar Syn-Hershko updated LUCENENET-489: - Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > New spatial module > ---

[jira] [Created] (LUCENENET-489) New spatial module

Itamar Syn-Hershko created LUCENENET-489: Summary: New spatial module Key: LUCENENET-489 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-489 Project: Lucene.Net Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-462) Spatial Search skipping records with small radius e.g. 1 mile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13279642#comment-13279642 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-462: -- This is now fixed with the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13279643#comment-13279643 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- This should be fixed with

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13280126#comment-13280126 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- That's not the newest spat

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13280266#comment-13280266 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- This code isn't mine :) T

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-483) Spatial Search skipping records when one location is close to origin, another one is away and radius is wider

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13280552#comment-13280552 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-483: -- Great. I updated the Luce

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-438) replace java doc notation with ms style xml comments notation.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293983#comment-13293983 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-438: -- This should be made by a t

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-457) Lucene locks directory with index after network related problems

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13293985#comment-13293985 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-457: -- I think having the write.l

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-495) Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393363#comment-13393363 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495: -- +1 Take a look at DateTim

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-495) Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393629#comment-13393629 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495: -- 1. IMO, if there is a thre

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-495) Use of DateTime.Now causes huge amount of System.Globalization.DaylightTime object allocations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13393633#comment-13393633 ] Itamar Syn-Hershko commented on LUCENENET-495: -- Makes sense