Re: [lustre-discuss] BCP for High Availability?

2023-01-19 Thread Cameron Harr via lustre-discuss
We (LLNL) were probably that Lab using pacemaker-remote, and we still are as it generally works and is what we're used to. That said, on an upcoming system, we may end up trying 2-node HA clusters due to the vendor's preference. I'm not sure what specifics you're interested in, but as you menti

[lustre-discuss] BCP for High Availability?

2023-01-15 Thread Andrew Elwell via lustre-discuss
Hi Folks, I'm just rebuilding my testbed and have got to the "sort out all the pacemaker stuff" part. What's the best current practice for the current LTS (2.15.x) release tree? I've always done this as multiple individual HA clusters covering each pair of servers with common dual connected drive