It is considered basic courtesy (or was).
Stephen Fryer
On 2017-09-05 6:44 PM, Ed Durbrow wrote:
On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:40 AM, G. C. wrote:
Is there no way to get the messages slimmer?
Sure. Just as I have trimmed your message, every individual can cut out
unnecessary repetition of previou
People could simply edit out the extraneous material when replying. It
isn't difficult.
Stephen Fryer
On 2017-09-05 4:26 PM, G. C. wrote:
No, Please, Wayne, that would be to destroy eventually long, but
interesting mails, and would infringe. It is not the size, its the
redundancy
On Sep 6, 2017, at 7:40 AM, G. C. wrote:
> Is there no way to get the messages slimmer?
Sure. Just as I have trimmed your message, every individual can cut out
unnecessary repetition of previous emails. Im with you.
Ed Durbrow
Saitama, Japan
http://www.youtube.com/user/edurbrow?feature=watch
No, Please, Wayne, that would be to destroy eventually long, but
interesting mails, and would infringe. It is not the size, its the
redundancy I'm talking about, which could perhaps somehow be reduced,
so the postings become easier to scan
--
To get on or off this list see list in
I suppose I could make the robot cut everything off after 50 lines.
Wayne
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: "G. C."
> Subject: [LUTE] Shorter emails
> Date: September 5, 2017 at 6:40:36 PM EDT
> To: Lutelist
>
> Dear lutelist,
> is there a way to remove all those endless quotings of
Dear lutelist,
is there a way to remove all those endless quotings of earlier mails in
the string, as well as the (also) endless links that have been
displayed in the previous, (endless) mails? Is there no way to get yhe
messages slimmer?
B.R.
G.
--
To get on or off this
I created a WEB page regarding the Brogyntyn replete for 3 lutes (a
Songe called trumpetts) at
http://fandango.musickshandmade.com/collections/preview/277 with an
intabulation of the Brogyntyn part, together with the two top viol parts
adapted for 2 G-tuning lutes. I hope it can be useful to so