Hello Simon,
On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:27:45 +1000 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 06:08:18PM +0900, Christian Balzer wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > One more thing I just noticed (must be part of the newer kernel since I
> > never saw it before is that it states this in the kernel log
I have inverstigated deeper with filtering only the port 80. Packets now go
to
The request is going to the real server, then go back to the load balancer
but never go back to the workstation. No output on eth0 to go out... (only
10.8.8.111 > 10.8.8.85)
Do I have to add a route or something like
I have tried the tcp dump but it gives to much info, I don't really
understand it, but it does not seems to have any http request.
Here is a screen shoot at time of the request. The workstation that tries to
retrive the page is 10.8.8.111.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p23734830/screen.jpg
Thank yo
Hello,
We having a problem where we use two servers as balancers LVS, one
master and other backup. However, my backup LVS server yet received
connections list. In the doc i saw a question about this and the answer
was that he could not list these connections.
(http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOW
Hi Graeme,
I found that it was not because OK is an HTTP keyword that the check was
not working,
but because OK is a substring of BR*OK*EN.
Daniel
Daniel Lemay wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> You were correct. It is now working.
>
> Thank you
>
> Daniel
>
> Graeme Fowler wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at
Hi Simon,
apt-get install ldirectord
ii ldirectord 1.2.5-3 Monitors virtual services provided by LVS
Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This looks like a bug in ldirectord whereby it thinks
> 192.168.58.56:/Route and 192.168.58.55:/Masq are the same
> thing and is using the same data s
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 20:11 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply. is my setup correct ? or am i missing something
> ?.
I don't know; your question is not related to LVS itself but to
Heartbeat, which has its own support mailing list. You'll find it here:
http://lists.linux-h
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Graeme Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 20:49 +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > I have heartbeat 2.99 and ldirectord running on mthost04 and mthost03.
> when
> > i stop apache on either of mthost05/02 it works as expected. when i stop
> > primary node (mthos
poiuytrez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ok, but the packets does not seems to go to the realservers. There is no log
> entry in apache. So the gateway is not the main problem.
>
>
IP 101 is your friend. I mean, SYN packets probably reach the RS, but
because the ACK arrive out of context on the client, the
Hello,
Ok, but the packets does not seems to go to the realservers. There is no log
entry in apache. So the gateway is not the main problem.
Thank you.
Graeme Fowler wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:04 +0800, Guillaume Charhon wrote:
>> It does not work and I don't have any ideas how to de
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:04 +0800, Guillaume Charhon wrote:
> It does not work and I don't have any ideas how to debug that.
The default gateway for the realservers should be 10.8.10.1.
If the netmask for everything is 255.255.255.0 (/24) then they'll have
no idea how to route back to 10.8.8.85.
11 matches
Mail list logo
