On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:07:41 +0200, Pierre Maziere wrote:
[...]
> Suspend to RAM may work, but I'd rather like to use the suspend to disk
IIRC I also tried it with suspend to disk (suspend2), without success.
This sounds logical, as from the computers point of view, suspend to
disk should be
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:07:41 +0200, Pierre Maziere wrote:
> Suspend to RAM may work, but I'd rather like to use the suspend to disk
hi Pierre. i'm curious to know why you prefer suspend-to-disk rather
than -to-ram.
-Nick
On 7/31/07, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:07:41 +0200, Pierre Maziere wrote:
> > Suspend to RAM may work, but I'd rather like to use the suspend to disk
>
> hi Pierre. i'm curious to know why you prefer suspend-to-disk rather
> than -to-ram.
> -Nick
>
this
On 31/07/07, Pierre Maziere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Nick Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi Pierre. i'm curious to know why you prefer suspend-to-disk rather
> > than -to-ram.
> > -Nick
> >
>
> this is to wake up my macmini when I am travelling in order to access some
> dat
