.
>-Original Message-
>From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
>boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext Michael Cronenworth
>Sent: 12 May, 2010 16:19
>To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
>Subject: Re: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
>
>Eero Tamminen wrote
Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
(standard disclaimer: below are my personal opinions)
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Who/where is the best place to contact in regards to my Ovi Store questions?
Today, I received a notice that the Ovi Store is "new and improved" but
the Maemo section is still
Hi,
ext Dawid Lorenz wrote:
On 10 May 2010 14:09, Eero Tamminen
mailto:eero.tammi...@nokia.com>> wrote:
Actually, what I'd love to be able to do is simply flush swap space
periodically. I've noticed that once swap space usage passes approx.
20%, device gradually becomes unbearable with regular
On 10 May 2010 14:09, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> If the issue is with Browser, just kill it and it will be restarted,
> just don't start it too many times in a row or you trigger SW watchdog.
> Browser can with long time usage also cause some swap fragmentation
> (=> extra swap activity), you can get
Hi,
ext Dawid Lorenz wrote:
On 7 May 2010 09:48, mailto:tero.k...@nokia.com>> wrote:
Very good point, seriously. Yet I think Marcin had ever better:
(Hm. Is Maemo showing its Debian roots?)
Good attempt for joke but failed. Debian has 'testing' branch which users can
use, test, report bugs a
> Luckily you can test that stuff in scratchbox...
But scratchbox isn't installable on n900...
--
Benoît HERVIER, Khertan Software - http://khertan.net/
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
> Qt simulator doesn't get the maemo specific goodies; it's not PR 1.1
> level either, it's just it'
"It's just a modified version of desktop Qt". If you ever feel like
buing a cheap logitech flat keyboard, don't.
>> cannot test the Qt 4.6.
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Sascha Mäkelä wrote:
> I would be already happy if the Qt Simulator in Qt SDK would run like
> PR1.2. Currently as it is I'm stuck on my development, because I
Qt simulator doesn't get the maemo specific goodies; it's not PR 1.1
level either, it's just it'
> cann
I would be already happy if the Qt Simulator in Qt SDK would run like
PR1.2. Currently as it is I'm stuck on my development, because I
cannot test the Qt 4.6.2 Maemo features like
WA_Maemo5PortraitOrientation.
Sascha
___
maemo-developers mailing list
mae
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 14:13 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010, Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
> >> On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
> > ...
> >> I am specifically interested in hildon-desktop packages
> >> (h
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Kimmo Hämäläinen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
...
I am specifically interested in hildon-desktop packages
(hildon-desktop, hildon-home, hildon-status-menu, etc.), and libhildon.
Those are
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:21 +0200, ext Matan Ziv-Av wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
...
> I am specifically interested in hildon-desktop packages
> (hildon-desktop, hildon-home, hildon-status-menu, etc.), and libhildon.
Those are all developed in completely open Gitorious.
Dnia piątek, 7 maja 2010 o 13:21:53 Matan Ziv-Av napisał(a):
> When you say "1.2 tree had moved forward", do you mean that the source
> packages in PR1.2 SDK are not the source of the actual packages that
> will be in PR1.2? Can we get updated source packages?
Leaked image has newer packages the
On Fri, 7 May 2010, tero.k...@nokia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext Nicola Mfb
Sent: 07 May, 2010 11:34
To: Andrea Grandi
Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Why should I write
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote:
[forwarding to the list too]
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, wrote:
[...]
> Later on when 4.6 got final it might have made sense, but as Eero said, the
> release is based on quality and not calendar. And the 1.2 tree had moved
> forward a lot in that
Hi,
On 7 May 2010 11:44, Dawid Lorenz wrote:
> Releasing "test-and-strictly-developer-aka-geek-oriented" images on regular
> basis would be simply great. Think of it like extras and
> extras-testing/devel - yet not for apps, but full-blown OS images. Normal
> users should strictly stay away from
On 7 May 2010 09:48, wrote:
> Look, the N900 is a consumer electronics device. That means that normal
> people, like your mother, the guy you passed on the street and the person
> drinking coffee in a cafe use it. Those people cannot handle crashes and bad
> quality. It really is that simple.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
> boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext Nicola Mfb
> Sent: 07 May, 2010 11:34
> To: Andrea Grandi
> Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org
> Subject: Re: Why should I write apps for Maem
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Andrea Grandi wrote:
[...]
> I was wondering the same thing: why is it so hard to provide a 1.1.2
> image with Qt 4.6.2 installed?
+1
If PR 1.2 has too many problems to be released before *few* days,
please release a 1.1.2 with the updated qt, actually having sky
Hi
On 7 May 2010 09:53, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> I wonder what so hard is in making PR 1.1.2 release which will give Qt 4.6 as
> standard (rather none of nokia apps use it) with 1.1.3 following it with few
> other small updates. We have May now and first talks about releasing PR1.2
> were "nex
Dnia czwartek, 6 maja 2010 o 18:27:34 Eero Tamminen napisał(a):
> ext Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > At most, the SDK should have been released two weeks ahead of the final
> > release.
>
> Agree.
Let me write few words about my view on maemo development.
PR 1.2 introduced at least two nice thi
Dnia czwartek, 6 maja 2010 o 18:27:34 Eero Tamminen napisał(a):
> > With a little over a month now on the clock, people can only
> > begin to speculate as to how poor Nokia's release management is working.
>
> Releases are not based on calendar, but on them being ready, based
> on testing result
Hi,
(standard disclaimer: below are my personal opinions)
ext Michael Cronenworth wrote:
At most, the SDK should have been released two weeks ahead of the final
release.
Agree.
With a little over a month now on the clock, people can only
begin to speculate as to how poor Nokia's release ma
Daniil Ivanov on 05/06/2010 01:39 AM wrote:
By commercial solution do you mean DRM?
Simply the ability to sell an application for profit. I'm a stanch
anti-DRM supporter.
Thanks,
Michael
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
Hi Michael!
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> The continued delay of PR 1.2 has caused me to pose this question.
>
> Without customized packaging, I cannot reliably publish applications to the
> global maemo.org repositories at this time. Also having APIs in flux withou
25 matches
Mail list logo
