'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 04/06/12 19:06 did gyre and gimble:
> I value(d) this option and think that replacing it with whatever
> mechanism is necessary would be an asset to Mageia, whereas I now view
> it's lack of function as a loss.
Did you check what I wrote tho'? Did you try conf
I'm in full agreement, however the point of my initial post was not to
obtain an evaluation of the merits of being able to, as part of the
install as was the case in versions previous to system D, but to ask if
a mechanism, providing the same function as was previously available,
through msec o
On Sunday, 3 June 2012 17:52:47 Colin Guthrie wrote:
> On the whole, this kind of "security" is basically bullshit anyway.
You can't make that assessment without understanding the rest of the security
environment.
> It
> might make things a tiny bit harder, but if you can get into the
> bootload
'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 03/06/12 21:54 did gyre and gimble:
> Sander Lepik wrote:
>> 03.06.2012 20:49, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
>>> Editing a text file to change a number, eg. from "5" to "3", is much easier
>>> to remember than changing a symlink to
> "/lib/systemd/system/runlevel3.t
'Twas brillig, and Johnny A. Solbu at 03/06/12 18:49 did gyre and gimble:
> On Sunday 03 June 2012 19:09, Felix Miata wrote:
>> On 2012/06/03 17:46 (GMT+0100) Colin Guthrie composed:
>>
> /etc/inittab is no longer used or read.
>>> For real men (and women), we just change the
>>> /etc/systemd
Sander Lepik wrote:
> 03.06.2012 20:49, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
>> Editing a text file to change a number, eg. from "5" to "3", is much easier
>> to remember than changing a symlink to
"/lib/systemd/system/runlevel3.target", especially when explaning this to a not
so advanced user over the pho
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 20:57:41 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
> AL13N wrote earlier:
> > For some of you, stuff you've known for ages is worthless now and you go
> > back to being a noob (for this sort of thing) and will have to relearn a
> > different way.
>
> The change here is new and needs a differ
AL13N wrote earlier:
> For some of you, stuff you've known for ages is worthless now and you go back
> to being a noob (for this sort of thing) and will have to relearn a different
> way.
The change here is new and needs a different way, yes. Nothing against
that. But the same result has been reac
Al 03/06/12 20:16, En/na AL13N ha escrit:
> truth of the matter is that old stuff inevitably gets historical baggage and
> different is not necessarily bad.
It is when it doesn't work or if you need a master's degree to get it working
(like, e.g. pulseaudio).
I didn't try systemd yet (apart fro
03.06.2012 20:49, Johnny A. Solbu kirjutas:
> Editing a text file to change a number, eg. from "5" to "3", is much easier
> to remember than changing a symlink to
> "/lib/systemd/system/runlevel3.target", especially when explaning this to a
> not so advanced user over the phone, who doesn't have
On Sunday 03 June 2012 20:16, AL13N wrote:
> it's not even a change, it's systemd vs sysvinit.
That may be so, but it is still a change.
> if you don't like it, you can still switch back to sysvinit,
I don't have to like it to use it. :-)=
--
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
signature
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 18:49:04 schreef Johnny A. Solbu:
[...]
> I agree with Felix, this is not a good change.
> I'm sure there is a perfectly valid ans sound reason for changig it, but
> there's a difference in changing it for the better and changing it for the
> worse. This is a bad change.
[...]
On Sunday 03 June 2012 19:09, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2012/06/03 17:46 (GMT+0100) Colin Guthrie composed:
>
> >>> /etc/inittab is no longer used or read.
> > For real men (and women), we just change the
> > /etc/systemd/system/default.target symlink to point at whatever target
> > we want to use
On 2012/06/03 17:46 (GMT+0100) Colin Guthrie composed:
/etc/inittab is no longer used or read.
For single user mode now-a-days we boot to rescue.target (this is done
automatically if you just put a 1 at the end of the kernel command line
to support "runlevel 1").
where do I change ini
2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie :
> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 03/06/12 17:12 did gyre and gimble:
>> 2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie :
>>> 'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
level of
'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 03/06/12 17:12 did gyre and gimble:
> 2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie :
>> 'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
>>> I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
>>> level of security as HIGH, that I am pe
2012/6/3 Colin Guthrie :
> 'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
>> I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
>> level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
>> Linux Single mode without a challenge passwo
'Twas brillig, and Richard Couture at 03/06/12 12:27 did gyre and gimble:
> I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
> level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
> Linux Single mode without a challenge password, which is a new, and IMHO
>
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 15:17:28 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
[...]
> > it's Anne's mail with subject: [Mageia-dev] Mageia 2 and Cauldron updated
> > with proper design
>
> Ok, I received that. Conclusion:
> My mail client (Googlemail online) does not honor references, splits
> threads by subject only.
2012/6/3 AL13N :
> Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
>> 2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa :
>> > On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
>> >> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
>> >> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I
Op zondag 3 juni 2012 14:04:07 schreef Wolfgang Bornath:
> 2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa :
> > On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
> >> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
> >> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
> >> the point
2012/6/3 Jani Välimaa :
> On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
>> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
>> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
>> the point?
>>
>
> New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still
On 03.06.2012 14:35, Richard Couture wrote:
> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
> the point?
>
New and unique subject isn't always enough. There's still some headers
from message which
Le 03/06/2012 13:40, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing the
> point?
I don't see a hijacked thread either.
Replaying on a different thread instead of creating a new one.
2012/6/3 Richard Couture :
> I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
> unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing the
> point?
I don't see a hijacked thread either.
--
wobo
>
>
> Richard
>
>
> On 06/03/2012 06:30 AM, Jani Välimaa wrot
I am a bit confused by your message... I sent my message with a new and
unique Subject, How is that considered hijacking a thread? Am I missing
the point?
Richard
On 06/03/2012 06:30 AM, Jani Välimaa wrote:
On 03.06.2012 14:27, Richard Couture wrote:
I notice that when, at the end of the i
On 03.06.2012 14:27, Richard Couture wrote:
> I notice that when, at the end of the installation of MGA2, I select the
> level of security as HIGH, that I am permitted entry into the system in
> Linux Single mode without a challenge password, which is a new, and IMHO
> undesirable, behavior from pr
27 matches
Mail list logo
