Plenty of people wrote:
I will say that for a list I run, I find the alphabetical ordering
useful.
All right, all right, I get it. :-)
I didn't want to bug anyone or take something away from you, I just thought
alphabetical sorting wouldn't be used. Apparently I thought wrong. So then
let's
Deal all,
I typically would prefer to see the queue of messages awaiting
moderation in time order, not alphabetically by email address
as happens by default.
I totally second that notion.
I have been thinking about this several times before, too.
Would indeed be a very useful addition.
Dear Mark,
should multiple messages from a single address be in separate,
time sorted boxes [...]
Just my 2ct: keep it simple, no need to have many config options here:
Just keep the one box per sender-idea, but sort the boxes by the time of the
latest email from that sender.
And thus
Dear all,
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Yeah, this is a problem. There's been a lot of water flowed under
that bridge since then, but you can only see it if you look at the
source trees (I mean the NEWS files, not the .py files :-).
Thanks for getting me up to speed.
I am looking forward to
Guys,
Also, my attitude would be much different if we were talking about
something that was not already at the end of its life cycle.
This brings me to a question I keep asking myself once every year for quite
some time now:
What's up with MM3?
Is there any indication on when it will be
Hi all,
thanks for your help, it is much appreciated.
Mark wrote:
This is a pre-MIME uuencoded attachment.
Wow - ancient indeed. Must have been around the time i played text-based
adventures in my local mailbox here. Whoops, memories coming up :-)
However, I don't understand why adding
Dear all,
I've got a strange problem that I'd ask for help with. I tried to word it as
easy I could.
Abstract:
Some MUAs send picture-attachments not seperated by MIME-delimiters, but by
begin and end. Mailman adding the list footer with a MIME-delimiter breaks
these mails.
Detailed
