Hi!
You can send an e-mail to:
listname-request@
With the word who and then your administrative password for the list in
the subject line. The caveat there is if there are any hidden members, they
will not return.
AFAIK, you cannot change how many subscribers are shown in the
administration
The problem I see with this is much like the DNSBLs and Block lists
(spamhaus?).
As Jason put it, one person's spam could very much be another person's
ham, so mail starts getting rejected by those who outright trust such a
database and it is hell trying to get removed from those said lists.
(figures, apparently my mail program is one of those *broken* ones so
apologies, this originally sent off list)
Hello Cyndi,
I do see where you are coming from, but abuse issues can go the opposite
direction from your description, and usually does.
The host I work for does NOT turn off mass
Hello,
Let me first say I was in no way competing with Cyndi's suggestion, I
should probably have prefaced by saying I think the option provided is a
good one. And again, we have no modifications to Mailman that is not
built in to modify (we have turned off personalization for example, but
That is EXACTLY right.
Mark Sapiro wrote:
My understanding of this is that double opt-in and what I call
confirmed opt-in are the same thing and that they mean
1. User requests to be on the list via a web form, email, etc. This is
the first opt-in. Note that strictly speaking, this probably
Remember, AOL is not the only retarded ISP out there.
Working for a web hosting company, I see this happen all the time. AOL is
notorious, but so is Comcast, Bellsouth, and Verizon (to name a few).
but hey, if it wasn't for Spam and horrible ISP's that block everyone except
themselves... think
