Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-29 Thread John W. Baxter
On 11/27/06 11:48 PM, "Brad Knowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The easiest way is to configure your MTA so that it has a different > and customized configuration that it uses for listening to a > particular numbered port on the "loopback" interface (a.k.a., > 127.0.0.1), and then you configure

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-28 Thread Brad Knowles
At 12:15 PM +0800 11/28/06, Stanley Chen wrote: > Can you elaborate more? How to seperate the mail queues and drop the > filter scans? The easiest way is to configure your MTA so that it has a different and customized configuration that it uses for listening to a particular numbered port on t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-27 Thread Stanley Chen
Can you elaborate more? How to seperate the mail queues and drop the filter scans? Mathias Andre wrote: >Thank you for all your comments, next time I'll RTFM a bit more :) > >I'll let you know how it goes, > >Mathias > >On 11/25/06, Jack Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>As one stat, on

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-27 Thread Mathias Andre
Thank you for all your comments, next time I'll RTFM a bit more :) I'll let you know how it goes, Mathias On 11/25/06, Jack Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As one stat, one of my lists of 10,000 is usually completed within 24 mins. > I usually drop all filter scans during that time, plus I u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-25 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Jack Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > As one stat, one of my lists of 10,000 is usually completed within > 24 mins. I usually drop all filter scans during that time, I don't do that. I have a special port on my MTA that only allows Mailman to connect to it and mail coming in that way is not being f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-25 Thread Jack Stone
As one stat, one of my lists of 10,000 is usually completed within 24 mins. I usually drop all filter scans during that time, plus I use 20 separate mail queues (sendmail) so too many don't pile up in a single queue and has to start over delaying send-outs. These 2 things have affected my speed

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-24 Thread Brad Knowles
At 8:39 AM +0100 11/24/06, Mathias Andre wrote: > In parallel of this migration we have been ask to set up a very large > mailing list: between 15000 to 25000 users. This would be a moderated > list (actually more like some kind of newsletter). > > I was wondering how well would mailman cope w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-24 Thread Mark Sapiro
Mathias Andre wrote: > >I was wondering how well would mailman cope with such a large list. >Has any of you done anything similar? See . -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Mathias Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi everyone, > > The organisation I work for is in the process of migrating our > currentmailing lists (using majordomo) to Mailman. > In parallel of this migration we have been ask to set up a very large > mailing list: between 15000 to 25000 users. This wou

[Mailman-Users] Mailman and (really) large lists

2006-11-23 Thread Mathias Andre
Hi everyone, The organisation I work for is in the process of migrating our currentmailing lists (using majordomo) to Mailman. In parallel of this migration we have been ask to set up a very large mailing list: between 15000 to 25000 users. This would be a moderated list (actually more like some k